Research Article
“Dimension Reduction: Feature Subset” Method for Selecting the Best Index Combination in Reputation Evaluation of Crowdsourcing Participants
Table 1
Weight of index variables after dimension reduction using ReliefF.
| Rank | Index variable | Weight |
| 1 | x 1 positive feedback rate | 0.054 | 2 | x 2 number of punishments in three months | 0.037 | 3 | x 3 refund rate in three months | 0.029 | 4 | x 4 refund rate in this month | 0.027 | 5 | x 5 credibility frozen after reporting | 0.023 | 6 | x 6 transaction activity | 0.023 | 7 | x 7 work attitude | 0.015 | 8 | x 8 task completion quality | 0.015 | 9 | x 9 work speed | 0.014 | 10 | x 10 years of opening | 0.014 | 11 | x 11 comprehensive scoring | 0.012 | 12 | x 12 number of employer nonrecommend | 0.008 | 13 | x 13 margin deposit amount | 0.008 | 14 | x 14 number of negative feedback | 0.007 | 15 | x 15 growth scoring | 0.006 | 16 | x 16 number of medium feedback | 0.0055 | 17 | x 17 number of punishments | 0.037 | 18 | x 18 employer repurchase rate | 0.001 | 19 | x 19 number of refunds in this month | 0.001 | 20 | x 20 number of refunds in three months | 0.0003 | 21 | x 21 city | 0.00001 | 22 | x 22 number of employer recommendation | −0.002 | 23 | x 23 number of positive feedback | −0.0029 | 24 | x 24 number of employers did not choose | −0.003 | 25 | x 25 transaction amount in recent three months | −0.0003 | 26 | x 26 number of employers served | −0.0037 | 27 | x 27 transaction times of three months | −0.0004 | 28 | x 28 store type | −0.0004 |
|
|