Research Article
Design of the Mixed Oral English Teaching Method Based on the Hierarchical Aggregation Algorithm
Table 1
Pretest and posttest t-test of oral English in control and experimental classes.
| Test dimension | Class | Sample size | Average | Standard deviation | t-value | Significance (double test) |
| Total pretest score | Control | 53 | 58.72 | 5.87 | 0.632 | 0.530 | Experimental | 54 | 58.68 | 5.56 | Total posttest score | Control | 53 | 72.87 | 6.28 | 3.027 | 0.003 | Experimental | 54 | 78.01 | 5.22 | Pretest language content | Control | 53 | 22.36 | 2.05 | 0.404 | 0.687 | Experimental | 54 | 22.70 | 2.26 | Posttest language content | Control | 53 | 30.53 | 2.49 | 0.703 | 0.686 | Experimental | 54 | 29.97 | 3.03 | Pretest language accuracy | Control | 53 | 16.12 | 1.41 | 1.259 | 0.213 | Experimental | 54 | 16.70 | 1.53 | Posttest language accuracy | Control | 53 | 22.26 | 2.82 | 3.753 | 0.026 | Experimental | 54 | 25.45 | 1.50 | Pretest phonological intonation | Control | 53 | 16.03 | 0.64 | 0.119 | 0.905 | Experimental | 54 | 16.09 | 0.58 | Posttest pronunciation and intonation | Control | 53 | 22.56 | 2.77 | 3.282 | 0.032 | Experimental | 54 | 24.41 | 1.38 |
|
|