Research Article
Study on Technical Movements’ Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Women’s Ski Jumping to Utilizing AI in 5G Network for Data Processing
Table 6
List of parameters of “ankle angle, knee angle, and hip angle” in parabola trajectory stage.
| Rank | Athletes | Ankle angle | Knee angle | Hip angle | The rising height of the center of mass (h) |
| 1 | Carina VOGT (GRE) | ↓ | 180° | 177.6° | 0.31 m | 2 | Daniela IRASCHKO-STOLZ (AUT) | ↓ | 180° | 173.2° | 0.28 m | 3 | Coline MATTEL (FRA) | ↓ | 180° | 172.5° | 0.24 m | 4 | Sara TAKANASHI (JPN) | ↓ | 180° | 174.3° | 0.20 m | 5 | Evelyn INSAM (ITA) | ↓ | 180° | 171.2° | 0.25 m | 6 | Maja VTIC (SLO) | ↓ | 180° | 173.5° | 0.19 m | 7 | Yuki ITO (JPN) | ↓ | 180° | 172.1° | 0.17 m | 8 | Maren LUNDBY (NOR) | ↓ | 180° | 173.6° | 0.17 m | | Best parameter model: Range (M ± SD) | Gradually decrease | 180° | 173.5° ± 1.9° | 0.23 m ± 0.05 m | | P | —— | >0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
|
|