The Static Stress Intensity Factor around the Antiplane Crack in an Infinite FGM Strip

<table>The effect of gradient parameter <svg height="12.4375" id="M100" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.6750002 12.4375" width="8.6750002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M480 416q0 -21 -18 -41q-9 -11 -17 -7q-20 9 -42 9q-62 0 -140 -78q23 -69 88 -192q17 -31 27 -42t20 -11q16 0 62 46l17 -20q-64 -92 -119 -92q-35 0 -70 66q-41 73 -84 187q-36 -30 -62 -61q-27 -115 -35 -172q-41 -8 -78 -20l-6 6l140 612q7 28 0.5 34t-37.5 7l-34 1
l5 26q38 4 74 13.5t57 17t25 7.5q12 0 4 -32l-104 -443h2q35 38 97 93q39 35 65.5 56t62 41.5t58.5 20.5q19 0 30.5 -10t11.5 -22z" id="x1D458"></path></g>
</svg> and inhomogenous coefficient <svg height="7.9499998" id="M101" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 7.3000002 7.9499998" width="7.3000002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M393 379q-9 -16 -28 -29q-15 -10 -23 -2q-19 19 -36 19q-21 0 -52 -38q-57 -72 -82 -126l-40 -197q-23 -3 -75 -18l-7 7q49 196 74 335q7 43 -2 43q-7 0 -30 -14.5t-47 -37.5l-16 23q37 42 82 73t67 31q41 0 15 -113l-11 -50h4q41 71 85 117t77 46q29 0 45 -26
q13 -21 0 -43z" id="x1D45F"></path></g>
</svg> on the stress intensity factor <svg height="15.0875" id="M102" style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 32.862499 15.0875" width="32.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><path d="M488 658v-28q-47 -3 -58.5 -12t-11.5 -39q49 -2 97 -15t93.5 -39.5t73.5 -75t28 -112.5q0 -53 -19.5 -96.5t-50 -71t-70 -47t-77.5 -27.5t-75 -9q0 -36 11.5 -45.5t58.5 -12.5v-28h-223v28q47 3 58.5 12.5t11.5 45.5q-47 1 -94.5 14t-93 39.5t-74.5 76t-29 114.5
q0 51 19 93.5t49 70t69.5 47t77.5 28t76 10.5q0 30 -11 39t-54 12v28h218zM335 118v429q-34 -2 -67 -13.5t-63.5 -35t-49.5 -65.5t-19 -96q0 -56 18.5 -99t49 -67.5t63.5 -37.5t68 -15zM418 547v-429q35 2 67.5 14t63.5 35.5t50 66.5t19 99t-19 99t-50 66.5t-64 35t-67 13.5
z" id="x3A6"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,12.88,12.138)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,18.761,12.138)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.921,12.138)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg>.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: The Static Stress Intensity Factor around the Antiplane Crack in an Infinite FGM Strip 