An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Location Selection of Transshipment Ports

Table 1

The fuzzy weights of all criteria and subcriteria.

Criteria/subcriteria	DMs	LVs	Fuzzy weights
𝐶1	A	M	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	VH
𝐶2	A	M	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶3	A	H	(0.3, 0.5, 0.7)
	B	L
	C	M
𝐶4	A	H	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	M
	C	H
𝐶5	A	VH	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	M
𝐶6	A	M	(0.467, 0.667, 0.8)
	B	M
	C	VH
𝐶11	A	H	(0.733, 0.933, 1)
	B	VH
	C	VH
𝐶12	A	L	(0.1, 0.3, 0.5)
	B	L
	C	M
𝐶13	A	VH	(0.667, 0.867, 1)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶14	A	M	(0.467, 0.667, 0.8)
	B	M
	C	VH
𝐶15	A	H	(0.733, 0.933, 1)
	B	VH
	C	VH
𝐶21	A	M	(0.4, 0.6, 0.8)
	B	M
	C	H
𝐶22	A	L	(0.2, 0.4, 0.6)
	B	H
	C	L
𝐶23	A	M	(0.567, 0.767, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	H
𝐶24	A	H	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	M
	C	H
𝐶25	A	H
	B	VH	(0.733, 0.933, 1)
	C	VH
𝐶31	A	VH
	B	VH	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	C	M
𝐶32	A	VH
	B	M	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	C	VH
𝐶33	A	M	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶34	A	L	(0.2, 0.4, 0.6)
	B	H
	C	L
𝐶35	A	M	(0.567, 0.767, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	H
𝐶41	A	H	(0.6, 0.8, 1)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶42	A	M	(0.567, 0.767, 0.9)
	B	H
	C	VH
𝐶43	A	VH	(0.467, 0.667, 0.8)
	B	M
	C	M
𝐶44	A	VH	(0.667, 0.867, 1)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶51	A	H	(0.567, 0.767, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	M
𝐶52	A	H	(0.3, 0.5, 0.7)
	B	L
	C	M
𝐶53	A	VH	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	B	M
	C	VH
𝐶54	A	VH	(0.633, 0.833, 0.9)
	B	VH
	C	M
𝐶55	A	H	(0.6, 0.8, 1)
	B	H
	C	H
𝐶61	A	H	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	M
	C	H
𝐶62	A	H	(0.733, 0.933, 1)
	B	VH
	C	VH
𝐶63	A	H	(0.5, 0.7, 0.9)
	B	M
	C	H
𝐶64	A	H
	B	VH	(0.733, 0.933, 1)
	C	VH
𝐶65	A	VH	(0.667, 0.867, 1)
	B	H
	C	H