A Distributed Flow Rate Control Algorithm for  Networked Agent System with Multiple Coding Rates to Optimize Multimedia Data Transmission

<table>Comparison of <svg height="20.424999" id="M285" style="vertical-align:-3.3907pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 18.112499 20.424999" width="18.112499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,16.137)"><path d="M515 96q-37 -44 -84.5 -76t-71.5 -32q-12 0 -18 7t-6 34t10 75l19 89h-2q-87 -113 -181 -176q-43 -29 -83 -29q-46 0 -46 63q0 31 9 67l52 222q7 36 -1 36q-10 0 -76 -50l-13 24q47 45 92 71.5t67 26.5q18 0 21 -16.5t-8 -65.5l-56 -242q-16 -67 13 -67q41 0 114 74
t114 146l32 145l74 26h11q-52 -199 -80 -347q-8 -39 6 -39q7 0 32 17.5t47 39.5z" id="x1D462"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.213,7.975)"><path d="M673 0h-245v28q47 6 58 16t1 39l-55 154h-213q-31 -87 -36 -129q-16 -47 -5 -61t68 -19v-28h-226v28q50 7 68.5 23.5t43.5 80.5l214 524l24 9l193 -536q23 -63 41.5 -79.5t68.5 -21.5v-28zM418 280l-81 255h-2q-74 -197 -101 -255h184z" id="x41"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.213,20.212)"><path d="M352 391q0 -31 -27 -44q-14 -7 -24 6q-39 48 -84 48q-23 0 -39.5 -15t-16.5 -40q0 -43 73 -90q49 -32 70 -58t21 -57q0 -58 -62 -105.5t-129 -47.5q-40 0 -75.5 25t-35.5 52q0 28 32 46q7 4 15 3t11 -6q19 -31 48.5 -50.5t54.5 -19.5q34 0 54 19.5t20 42.5q0 43 -65 81
q-97 56 -97 123q0 50 51 96q19 17 58 32.5t62 15.5q37 0 61 -18t24 -39z" id="x1D460"></path></g>
</svg> and <svg height="20.237499" id="M286" style="vertical-align:-3.3907pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.887501 20.237499" width="16.887501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,15.95)"><path d="M515 96q-37 -44 -84.5 -76t-71.5 -32q-12 0 -18 7t-6 34t10 75l19 89h-2q-87 -113 -181 -176q-43 -29 -83 -29q-46 0 -46 63q0 31 9 67l52 222q7 36 -1 36q-10 0 -76 -50l-13 24q47 45 92 71.5t67 26.5q18 0 21 -16.5t-8 -65.5l-56 -242q-16 -67 13 -67q41 0 114 74
t114 146l32 145l74 26h11q-52 -199 -80 -347q-8 -39 6 -39q7 0 32 17.5t47 39.5z" id="x1D462"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.213,7.8)"><path d="M372 352v-2q176 -27 176 -159q0 -99 -95 -151q-73 -40 -196 -40h-221v28q65 5 78.5 19t13.5 76v404q0 63 -12 77t-72 18v28h257q102 0 150 -34q26 -18 41 -48.5t15 -65.5q0 -111 -135 -150zM213 362h47q80 0 117.5 32t37.5 96q0 56 -33 92t-100 36q-41 0 -56 -10
q-13 -8 -13 -50v-196zM213 328v-203q0 -54 17 -72.5t66 -18.5q67 1 110.5 37t43.5 110q0 147 -192 147h-45z" id="x42"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.213,20.038)"><path d="M352 391q0 -31 -27 -44q-14 -7 -24 6q-39 48 -84 48q-23 0 -39.5 -15t-16.5 -40q0 -43 73 -90q49 -32 70 -58t21 -57q0 -58 -62 -105.5t-129 -47.5q-40 0 -75.5 25t-35.5 52q0 28 32 46q7 4 15 3t11 -6q19 -31 48.5 -50.5t54.5 -19.5q34 0 54 19.5t20 42.5q0 43 -65 81
q-97 56 -97 123q0 50 51 96q19 17 58 32.5t62 15.5q37 0 61 -18t24 -39z" id="x1D460"></path></g>
</svg> in the scenario of mobile node increase.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: A Distributed Flow Rate Control Algorithm for  Networked Agent System with Multiple Coding Rates to Optimize Multimedia Data Transmission 