Research Article
Analysis of Unsteady Axisymmetric Squeezing Fluid Flow with Slip and No-Slip Boundaries Using OHAM
Table 7
Comparison of OHAM and RK4 solutions for various
in case of slip and no-slip boundary.
| | In case of no-slip boundary | In case of slip boundary | | | | | | | | |
| | 0.0 | 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. | | 0.1 | 2.33147 × 10−15 | 1.62249 × 10−10 | 2.41725 × 10−9 | 8.44379 × 10−10 | 7.90896 × 10−9 | 4.1479 × 10−8 | | 0.2 | 9.49241 × 10−14 | 3.14228 × 10−10 | 4.67809 × 10−9 | 1.6672 × 10−9 | 1.55832 × 10−8 | 8.15527 × 10−8 | | 0.3 | 3.82361 × 10−13 | 4.46143 × 10−10 | 6.63065 × 10−9 | 2.44889 × 10−9 | 2.28102 × 10−8 | 1.18952 × 10−7 | | 0.4 | 9.13492 × 10−13 | 5.47932 × 10−10 | 8.11705 × 10−9 | 3.1663 × 10−9 | 2.93539 × 10−8 | 1.52339 × 10−7 | | 0.5 | 1.65451 × 10−12 | 6.07476 × 10−10 | 8.95202 × 10−9 | 3.77514 × 10−9 | 3.48026 × 10−8 | 1.79574 × 10−7 | | 0.6 | 2.42317 × 10−12 | 6.09434 × 10−10 | 8.91445 × 10−9 | 4.18241 × 10−9 | 3.8327 × 10−8 | 1.96532 × 10−7 | | 0.7 | 2.86218 × 10−12 | 5.36833 × 10−10 | 7.77928 × 10−9 | 4.22088 × 10−9 | 3.84569 × 10−8 | 1.96009 × 10−7 | | 0.8 | 2.52039 × 10−12 | 3.78563 × 10−10 | 5.4278 × 10−9 | 3.65208 × 10−9 | 3.31085 × 10−8 | 1.67861 × 10−7 | | 0.9 | 1.20232 × 10−12 | 1.54202 × 10−10 | 2.18716 × 10−9 | 2.24454 × 10−9 | 2.02732 × 10−8 | 1.02385 × 10−7 | | 1.0 | 1.26281 × 10−16 | 2.53545 × 10−16 | 2.93337 × 10−17 | 1.7436 × 10−14 | 4.92715 × 10−14 | 3.8179 × 10−14 |
|
|
