A New Reversible Database Watermarking Approach with Firefly Optimization Algorithm

<div>Comparison of FFADEW performance for different <svg height="9.25658pt" id="M247" style="vertical-align:-3.295671pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 25.2924 9.25658" width="25.2924pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M383 397C383 424 344 448 299 448C244 448 172 409 132 375C66 319 23 227 23 146C23 42 74 -12 146 -12C208 -12 298 30 359 103L343 124C315 95 248 48 192 48C145 48 111 85 111 163C111 228 129 294 151 330C171 363 201 401 241 401C275 401 302 384 325 356C332 347 339 344 348 348C373 360 383 381 383 397Z" id="g113-100"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="406" vert-adv-y="406"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,4.173,3.132)"><path d="M810 0V30C751 35 744 40 744 106V296C744 396 694 451 614 451C583 451 558 438 537 425C512 409 485 391 454 368C434 420 390 451 342 451C309 451 285 439 260 424C228 405 206 387 185 372V453C141 434 90 421 43 413V386C102 378 105 373 105 309V106C105 41 96 35 29 30V0H243V30C194 35 185 41 185 106V335C216 360 256 389 297 389C357 389 384 348 384 275V106C384 41 374 35 312 30V0H530V30C475 35 465 41 465 104V294C465 313 464 324 463 336C502 367 539 389 576 389C637 389 663 346 663 274V109C663 41 653 35 593 30V0H810Z" id="g58-107"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="834" vert-adv-y="834"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.735,3.132)"><path d="M262 451C169 451 38 375 38 210C38 98 121 -12 261 -12C360 -12 481 64 481 227C481 351 386 451 262 451ZM249 414C337 414 385 320 385 204C385 70 333 25 272 25C189 25 134 117 134 241C134 355 189 414 249 414Z" id="g58-109"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="519" vert-adv-y="519"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,16.293,3.132)"><path d="M487 439H304V409C361 402 367 391 351 344C328 280 297 190 262 110C235 178 192 284 168 353C152 396 153 403 208 409V439H-1V409C54 401 61 394 85 338C133 221 179 111 224 -10H255C312 139 363 260 398 336C426 394 432 401 487 409V439Z" id="g58-116"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="473" vert-adv-y="473"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,20.652,3.132)"><path d="M384 109C349 76 310 59 268 59C197 59 123 113 120 245C240 248 367 259 384 262C403 266 407 275 407 296C407 376 338 451 254 451H253C201 451 148 425 105 378C65 334 39 272 39 203C39 88 112 -12 235 -12C266 -12 339 5 402 84L384 109ZM230 411C285 411 319 365 319 313C319 298 313 293 294 293C236 291 180 290 125 290C141 370 185 411 230 411Z" id="g58-99"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="434" vert-adv-y="434"></glyph.data></g></svg> values.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig17

Figure 17

Figure 17: A New Reversible Database Watermarking Approach with Firefly Optimization Algorithm 