Energy Near-Optimal Control Strategies for Industrial and Traction Drives with a.c. Motors

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Position control</td><td class="align_center">Energy optimal</td><td class="align_center">Trapezoidal speed profile</td><td class="align_center">Limited stator current</td><td class="align_center">Triangular speed profile</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Energy consumption [J]</td><td class="align_center">368.238</td><td class="align_center">371.930</td><td class="align_center">378,829</td><td class="align_center">517,936</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Consumption comparison [%]</td><td class="align_center">100.00</td><td class="align_center">101.00</td><td class="align_center">102,88</td><td class="align_center">140.65</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="5"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td>Evaluation in percentage is related to the consumption of energy optimal control.<br/></td></tr></table>

Energy consumptions of all four investigated position control strategies of industrial 10 kW drive.

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Energy Near-Optimal Control Strategies for Industrial and Traction Drives with a.c. Motors 