A Case Study of IPv6 Network Performance: Packet Delay, Loss, and Reordering

<table class="table-group" id="tab5"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Type </td><td class="align_center">APNIC</td><td class="align_center">AFRNIC</td><td class="align_center">ARIN</td><td class="align_center">LACNIC</td><td class="align_center">RIPENCC</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">IPv6 (<svg height="11.7978pt" id="M103" style="vertical-align:-0.2063999pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.5914 30.8134 11.7978" width="30.8134pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M471 153C471 170 463 194 452 212C400 220 373 229 322 255C373 281 400 290 452 298C463 316 471 339 471 357C456 366 431 371 410 370C377 329 356 310 308 279C311 336 317 364 336 413C326 432 310 451 294 459C279 451 262 432 252 413C271 364 277 336 280 279C232 310 211 329 178 370C157 371 132 367 117 357C117 340 125 316 136 298C188 290 215 281 266 255C215 229 188 220 136 212C125 194 117 171 117 153C132 144 157 139 178 140C211 181 232 200 280 231C277 174 271 146 252 97C262 78 278 59 294 51C309 59 326 78 336 97C317 146 311 174 308 231C356 200 377 181 410 140C431 139 456 143 471 153Z" id="g113-43"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,7.631,0)"><path d="M384 0V27C293 34 287 42 287 114V635C232 613 172 594 109 583V559L157 557C201 555 205 550 205 499V114C205 42 199 34 109 27V0H384Z" id="g113-50"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,13.871,0)"><path d="M241 635C89 635 35 457 35 312C35 153 89 -12 240 -12C390 -12 443 166 443 312C443 466 390 635 241 635ZM238 602C329 602 354 454 354 312C354 172 330 22 240 22C152 22 124 173 124 313S148 602 238 602Z" id="g113-49"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,20.158,-5.741)"><path d="M556 236V289H56V236H556Z" id="g54-33"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.718,-5.741)"><path d="M141 347C171 480 264 541 327 570C364 587 403 599 436 605L429 641C389 634 339 622 300 609C191 570 37 458 37 239C37 86 126 -12 245 -12C367 -12 454 89 454 210C454 314 380 397 272 397C252 397 230 390 208 380L141 347ZM231 338C323 338 366 257 366 174C366 108 340 27 263 27C180 27 129 123 129 244C129 268 130 292 135 310C158 323 193 338 231 338Z" id="g50-55"></path></g></svg>)</td><td class="align_center">8.1329</td><td class="align_center">0</td><td class="align_center">0.1686</td><td class="align_center">3.2457</td><td class="align_center">0</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">IPv4 (<svg height="11.7978pt" id="M104" style="vertical-align:-0.2063999pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.5914 30.8134 11.7978" width="30.8134pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M471 153C471 170 463 194 452 212C400 220 373 229 322 255C373 281 400 290 452 298C463 316 471 339 471 357C456 366 431 371 410 370C377 329 356 310 308 279C311 336 317 364 336 413C326 432 310 451 294 459C279 451 262 432 252 413C271 364 277 336 280 279C232 310 211 329 178 370C157 371 132 367 117 357C117 340 125 316 136 298C188 290 215 281 266 255C215 229 188 220 136 212C125 194 117 171 117 153C132 144 157 139 178 140C211 181 232 200 280 231C277 174 271 146 252 97C262 78 278 59 294 51C309 59 326 78 336 97C317 146 311 174 308 231C356 200 377 181 410 140C431 139 456 143 471 153Z" id="g113-43"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,7.631,0)"><path d="M384 0V27C293 34 287 42 287 114V635C232 613 172 594 109 583V559L157 557C201 555 205 550 205 499V114C205 42 199 34 109 27V0H384Z" id="g113-50"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,13.871,0)"><path d="M241 635C89 635 35 457 35 312C35 153 89 -12 240 -12C390 -12 443 166 443 312C443 466 390 635 241 635ZM238 602C329 602 354 454 354 312C354 172 330 22 240 22C152 22 124 173 124 313S148 602 238 602Z" id="g113-49"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,20.158,-5.741)"><path d="M556 236V289H56V236H556Z" id="g54-33"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.718,-5.741)"><path d="M414 144C384 79 371 75 317 75H135L276 221C367 316 408 376 408 465C408 570 327 635 237 635C179 635 131 609 100 575L42 494L67 471C94 510 138 565 205 565C277 565 321 517 321 435C321 348 258 270 195 195C146 137 88 81 33 26V0H411C423 44 433 88 446 135L414 144Z" id="g50-51"></path></g></svg>)</td><td class="align_center">0.7243</td><td class="align_center">0.7343</td><td class="align_center">0.7857</td><td class="align_center">1.3629</td><td class="align_center">0.8186</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Packet reordering rate comparison between IPv4 and IPv6.

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

tab5

Table 5

Table 5: A Case Study of IPv6 Network Performance: Packet Delay, Loss, and Reordering 