Research Article
Improving the Accuracy of the Charge Simulation Method for Numerical Conformal Mapping
Table 4
Comparison of CUP time (s) for Example
3.
| Charge points | | | | | | | |
| Amano’s method | 0.0316 | 0.0758 | 0.1238 | 0.1600 | 0.2389 | 0.2920 | 0.3851 | Our method | 0.0032 | 0.0111 | 0.0069 | 0.0147 | 0.0045 | 0.0096 | 0.0118 |
|
|