Research Article
Prediction of Seawall Settlement Based on a Combined LS-ARIMA Model
Table 1
Comparison of the LS-ARIMA, ARIMA, and GM (1, 1) model results based on validation data.
| Point number | Measured value (mm) | LS-ARIMA model (mm) | Relative error (%) | ARIMA (mm) | Relative error (%) | GM (1, 1) (mm) | Error (%) |
| 51 | 54.42 | 54.51 | 0.17 | 54.12 | 0.55 | 65.95 | 21.19 | 52 | 54.44 | 54.49 | 0.09 | 54.63 | 0.35 | 67.65 | 24.27 | 53 | 54.55 | 54.68 | 0.24 | 54.78 | 0.42 | 69.40 | 27.22 | 54 | 54.81 | 54.95 | 0.26 | 55.25 | 0.80 | 71.19 | 29.88 | 55 | 55.20 | 55.28 | 0.14 | 55.91 | 1.28 | 73.02 | 32.29 | 56 | 55.61 | 55.72 | 0.20 | 55.81 | 0.36 | 74.91 | 34.70 | 57 | 56.06 | 56.13 | 0.13 | 56.33 | 0.48 | 76.84 | 37.07 | 58 | 56.50 | 56.74 | 0.42 | 56.83 | 0.58 | 78.82 | 39.51 | 59 | 56.75 | 56.87 | 0.22 | 57.34 | 1.04 | 80.86 | 42.48 | 60 | 56.92 | 57.19 | 0.47 | 57.58 | 1.16 | 82.94 | 45.72 |
|
|
Note: the relative error is calculated by , wherein is the measured value, and is the predicted value.
|