Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Method of China’s Regional Potential for Electrical Energy Substitution

Table 8

Relative close degree of each evaluated object and ideal point based on the distance of connection vectors.

Evaluation object				Rank
Beijing	0.8185	0.6789	0.4534	18
Shanghai	0.8887	0.7346	0.4525	19
Tianjin	0.9511	0.7358	0.4362	21
Chongqing	0.9363	0.7473	0.4439	20
Sichuan	0.6543	0.9212	0.5847	4
Hebei	0.5638	0.8804	0.6096	3
Shanxi	0.6937	0.8633	0.5545	6
Shandong	0.3324	0.8702	0.7236	1
Jiangsu	0.6177	0.7978	0.5636	5
Zhejiang	0.7659	0.8069	0.5130	10
Anhui	0.8587	0.7895	0.4790	14
Fujian	0.8837	0.7561	0.4611	16
Hubei	0.8276	0.8119	0.4952	13
Hunan	0.8134	0.8099	0.4989	12
Henan	0.4955	1.0342	0.6761	2
Jiangxi	0.8769	0.7427	0.4585	17
Liaoning	0.7537	0.8194	0.5209	9
Shaanxi	0.7910	0.8808	0.5269	7
Gansu	0.9698	0.6777	0.4113	23
Ningxia	1.0660	0.4821	0.3114	24
Xinjiang	0.8070	0.7239	0.4729	15
Heilongjiang	0.8053	0.8296	0.5074	11
Inner Mongolia	0.7406	0.8101	0.5224	8
Qinghai	1.0844	0.2240	0.1712	25
Jilin	0.9447	0.6647	0.4130	22