Research Article
Screening the Main Factors Affecting the Wear of the Scraper Conveyor Chute Using the Plackett–Burman Method
Table 8
Response table for wear loss.
| Run | Wear | A | B | C | D | E | F | No. | loss (mg) | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
| 1 | 49 | 49 | | | 49 | | 49 | | 49 | 49 | | 49 | | 2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 2.8 | | 3 | 53.8 | 53.8 | | | 53.8 | | 53.8 | 53.8 | | | 53.8 | | 53.8 | 4 | 130.9 | 130.9 | | | 130.9 | 130.9 | | | 130.9 | | 130.9 | 130.9 | | 5 | 164.3 | | 164.3 | | 164.3 | | 164.3 | 164.3 | | 164.3 | | 164.3 | | 6 | 223.1 | | 223.1 | 223.1 | | 223.1 | | 223.1 | | | 223.1 | 223.1 | | 7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | | 1.5 | | 1.5 | | | 1.5 | 1.5 | | | 1.5 | 8 | 271.2 | | 271.2 | | 271.2 | 271.2 | | | 271.2 | | 271.2 | | 271.2 | 9 | 108.4 | | 108.4 | | 108.4 | 108.4 | | 108.4 | | 108.4 | | | 108.4 | 10 | 137 | | 137 | 137 | | | 137 | | 137 | | 137 | 137 | | 11 | 5.1 | 5.1 | | 5.1 | | | 5.1 | 5.1 | | | 5.1 | | 5.1 | 12 | 59.2 | | 59.2 | 59.2 | | | 59.2 | | 59.2 | 59.2 | | | 59.2 | Tatal | 1206.3 | 243.1 | 963.2 | 428.7 | 777.6 | 737.9 | 468.4 | 557.5 | 648.8 | 385.2 | 821.1 | 707.1 | 499.2 | Value | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | Average | 40.5 | 160.5 | 71.5 | 129.6 | 123 | 78.1 | 92.9 | 108.1 | 64.2 | 136.9 | 117.9 | 83.2 | Effect | 120 | 58.1 | -44.9 | 15.2 | 72.7 | -34.7 |
|
|