Research Article
Solving Integrated Process Planning, Dynamic Scheduling, and Due Date Assignment Using Metaheuristic Algorithms
Table 8
Comparison of solutions at different integration levels for shop floor 8.
| Level | Algorithm | Best | Average | Worst | CPU (s) |
| 1-SIRO-RDM | VNS | 1670.78 | 1670.78 | 1672.39 | 330 | | SA | 1662.96 | 1665.28 | 1667.40 | 336 | | TA | 1540.97 | 1583.97 | 1662.53 | 333 | | GA | 1576.26 | 1578.43 | 1579.66 | 698 | | HA | 1596.39 | 1598.75 | 1600.79 | 683 | 2-DSP-RDM | VNS | 1524.83 | 1572.95 | 1665.59 | 325 | | SA | 1648.10 | 1664.70 | 1683.02 | 335 | | TA | 1520.66 | 1568.20 | 1654.37 | 332 | | GA | 1583.77 | 1585.29 | 1586.08 | 698 | | HA | 1592.13 | 1633.13 | 1666.77 | 698 | 3-SIRO-DD | VNS | 1647.39 | 1647.42 | 1651.04 | 168 | | SA | 1641.08 | 1654.84 | 1674.16 | 171 | | TA | 1635.27 | 1636.65 | 1649.23 | 202 | | GA | 1135.05 | 1530.61 | 1623.52 | 350 | | HA | 1643.08 | 1654.90 | 1667.06 | 295 | 4-DSP-DD | VNS | 1312.05 | 1339.74 | 1322.21 | 329 | | SA | 1285.0 | 1290.05 | 1300.06 | 328 | | TA | 1255.75 | 1260.85 | 1304.91 | 329 | | GA | 1265.41 | 1280.32 | 1298.51 | 348 | | HA | 1246.18 | 1255.60 | 1298.51 | 337 |
|
|