Research Article
Aerial Infrared Target Tracking in Complex Background Based on Combined Tracking and Detecting
Table 2
Comparisons with six state-of-the-art tracking methods on three infrared image sequences and two sequences from VOT-TIR 2016.
| | | | CTAD (Ours) | TLD | LSST | KCF | C-COT | ECO | LCT |
| | Sequence 1 | DPR(%) | 86.6 | 29.4 | 29.3 | 59.2 | 90.6 | 75.4 | 69.7 | | OSR(%) | 78.5 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 27.3 | 61.4 | 41.7 | 35.3 | | Speed (fps) | 17.6 | 37.9 | 7.0 | 178.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 18.5 |
| | Sequence 2 | DPR(%) | 75.1 | 51.3 | 6.7 | 69.3 | 100 | 100 | 81.3 | | OSR(%) | 53.6 | 18 | 0.1 | 28.4 | 46.5 | 45.7 | 52.8 | | Speed (fps) | 18.4 | 25.0 | 6.4 | 185.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 20.9 |
| | Sequence 3 | DPR(%) | 100 | 13.6 | 70.9 | 40.8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | | OSR(%) | 93.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 25.4 | 61.6 | 53.5 | 75.8 | | Speed (fps) | 18.9 | 31.2 | 6.9 | 174.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 19.2 |
| | VOT-TIR 1 | DPR(%) | 79.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 51.0 | 61.2 | 48.9 | 8.4 | | OSR(%) | 77.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 16.9 | 54.5 | 9.0 | | Speed (fps) | 17.6 | 25.4 | 7.5 | 192.0 | 0.3 | 1.68 | 18.5 |
| | VOT-TIR 2 | DPR(%) | 75.7 | 4.8 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 77.4 | 12.1 | 80.1 | | OSR(%) | 74.5 | 2.0 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 66.6 | 12.1 | 59.4 | | Speed (fps) | 18.6 | 28.0 | 9.4 | 197.0 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 19.9 |
| | Average | DPR(%) | 81.1 | 19.9 | 23.9 | 46.5 | 85.9 | 67.3 | 67.1 | | OSR(%) | 75.7 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 18.7 | 50.6 | 41.5 | 46.4 | | Speed (fps) | 18.1 | 29.5 | 7.4 | 185.2 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 19.4 |
|
|
