Fault Identification Method of Diesel Engine in Light of Pearson Correlation Coefficient Diagram and Orthogonal Vibration Signals

Table 6

Identification rates in percent corresponding to Figure 5.

Corresponding Figure	Fault identification rate under different working conditions (%)
	Normal fuel supply	Slight fuel leakage	Severe fuel leakage	Fuel cut-off
Figure 5(a)	83.78	77.27	75	100
Figure 5(b)	56.76	22.73	65.63	80
Figure 5(c)	83.78	81.82	84.38	100
Figure 5(d)	91.89	86.36	96.88	100
Figure 5(e)	56.76	22.73	65.63	80
Figure 5(f)	91.89	86.36	93.75	100
Figure 5(g)	86.49	81.82	90.63	100
Figure 5(h)	91.89	95.45	96.88	100

Note: the data of the table in bold are the highest fault identification rate obtained under different working conditions when using different fault identification methods.