Esthetic Evaluation of Facial Soft Tissue Based on Nonrigid Image Deformation

Table 4

Differences of the actual clinical effects and the ideal aesthetic of different genders.

Comparison (group A-B)	Clinical groups-male evaluators	Clinical groups-female evaluators	Male evaluators-female evaluators
Zy-Zy/P-P	0.027	0.015	0.603
Go-Go/P-P	0.540	0.817	1.000
Sn-Me/P-P	0.002	<0.001	0.770
Go-Go/Sn-Me	0.112	0.037	0.042
G-Pn-Pos (°)	0.135	0.166	0.244
G-Sn-Pos (°)	0.022	0.041	0.076
Pn-Ns-Sn (°)	0.089	0.091	0.358
Cm-Sn-ULA (°)	<0.001	<0.001	0.544
Pos-B’-LV (°)	0.006	0.003	0.566
ULA-Ns-Pos (°)	0.740	0.611	0.341
LLA-Ns-Pos (°)	0.023	0.004	0.024
ULA-Ns-LLA (°)	<0.001	<0.001	0.301
OP-Ns-Pos (°)	0.002	0.001	0.188
H-Ns-Pos (°)	0.533	0.301	0.222
OP-A’-ULA (°)	0.002	0.002	0.098
OP-B’-LLA (°)	0.110	0.039	0.768