Research Article

Analysis of Arrhenius Kinetics on Multiphase Flow between a Pair of Rotating Circular Plates

Table 2

Comparison of for various values of by shooting method and DTM-Padé .

Shooting methodDTM-PadéShooting methodDTM-PadéShooting methodDTM-Padé

0.030.010.05532−1.48750051−1.48750051−1.48747228−1.48747228−1.48745764−1.48745764
0.06−2.31230089−2.31230089−2.31224459−2.31224459−2.31221539−2.31221539
0.09−3.59230155−3.59230155−3.59222994−3.59222994−3.59219276−3.59219276
0.050.1−1.37683310−1.37683310−1.37684321−1.37684321−1.60791008−1.60791008
0.3−1.29862771−1.29862771−1.29864147−1.29864147−1.40562686−1.40562686
0.5−1.26476393−1.26476393−1.26477795−1.26477795−1.33606822−1.33606822
0.01−0.05−2.16407621−2.16407621−2.16408297−2.16408297−3.91679239−3.91679239
0.02−2.03817454−2.03817454−2.03817048−2.03817048−3.69044429−3.69044429
0.12−1.96569720−1.96569720−1.85623506−1.85623506−3.49325834−3.49325834
0.015−2.05625050−2.05625050−2.05624885−2.05624885−3.72303640−3.72303640
10−2.17949478−2.17949478−2.17949321−2.17949321−3.77225894−3.77225894
15−2.29665895−2.29665895−2.29665738−2.29665738−3.82221775−3.82221775
52−1.99640130−1.99640130−2.81393318−2.81393318−3.69971651−3.69971651
3−1.95271335−1.95271335−2.29665738−2.29665738−3.68433831−3.68433831
4−1.93641884−1.93641884−2.07634697−2.07634697−3.67871779−3.67871779
22−1.99640130−1.99640130−2.81393318−2.81393318−3.69971651−3.69971651
4−2.06392299−2.06392299−3.48018830−3.48018830−3.72438933−3.72438933
6−2.12957297−2.12957297−4.03630116−4.03630116−3.74942313−3.74942313