Abstract

In this paper, we consider a time-dependent risk model with a Brownian perturbation. In this model, there is a dependence structure between the claim sizes and their corresponding interarrival times. Assuming the claim sizes have subexponential distributions, we obtain the asymptotic lower bound of the finite-time ruin probability. When the claim sizes have distributions from the class , the asymptotic upper bound of the finite-time ruin probability has been presented. These results confirm that when the claim sizes are heavy-tailed, the asymptotics of the finite-time ruin probability of this time-dependent model are insensitive to the Brownian perturbation.

1. Introduction

This paper considers a dependent risk model with a constant force of interest and Brownian perturbation. In such a model, the claim sizes form a sequence of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) nonnegative random variables , with a distribution F and the interarrival times are also a sequence of i.i.d. nonnegative random variables , with a distribution G. In this paper, we consider there exists a dependence structure between the claim sizes , and their corresponding interarrival times . The claim arrival times are denoted by . The renewal counting processis the number of claims by time t. Suppose that , has a finite mean:

Then, the amount of aggregate claim sizes is , where by convention, . Suppose that, in this risk model, there is a constant force of interest . The discounted aggregate claim size by time t iswhere is the indicator function of an event A. Then, the insurer’s surplus process of an insurance company by time t iswhere is the initial surplus; is the premium income up to time t, , which is a nondecreasing and nonnegative stochastic process satisfying and , almost surely; , is a diffusion perturbation which is a standard Brownian motion, and is a volatility factor. Throughout the paper, we suppose that , , and are mutually independent. For every , let . The finite-time ruin probability up to time t is defined as

This paper considers the asymptotics for as x tends to under the heavy-tailed claim sizes.

When the claim sizes , and the interarrival time , are independent, there are many literatures to investigate ruin probabilities for claim sizes with independent/dependent structure (see, e.g., Asmussen [1], Chen and Ng [2], Hao and Tang [3], Kalashnikov and Konstantinides [4], Klüppelberg and Stadtmüller [5], Konstantinides et al. [6], Wang et al. [7], Dong et al. [8], Fu et al. [9], Li [10], Peng et al. [11], Peng and Wang [12, 13], Yang et al. [14], Yu et al. [15], and Zhang et al. [16]). However, in the last few years, many researchers have proposed some dependent risk models with various dependence structures modeling the dependence between the claim sizes and their corresponding interarrival times (see, e.g., Albrecher and Teugels [17], Boudreault et al. [18], Cossette et al. [19], Badescu et al. [20], and Asmussen et al. [21]).

In this paper, we use the dependence structure proposed by Asimit and Badescu [22]. Assume that , are i.i.d. copies of a generic pair with dependent components X and θ satisfyingholds uniformly for , where is a measurable function and the symbol means that the quotient of both sides tends to 1 as . Asimit and Badescu [22] and Li et al. [23] have shown that (6) can be satisfied by many copulas, such as Ali-Mikhail-Haq copula, Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern copula, and Frank copula.

Using the uniformity of (6), we know that . Thus, we can define a random variable , which is independent of , , , and and has the following distribution:

Define and , which constitute a delayed renewal counting processwith a mean function

For the risk model (4), when the claim sizes , and the interarrival times , are independent and the premium income process , is a linear process, Li [10] provided the asymptotics of the finite-time ruin probability for subexponential claim sizes. Wang et al. [24] considered a risk model with stochastic return. This paper considers there exists a dependence structure (6) between the claim sizes , and their corresponding interarrival times , and provides the estimates of the finite-time ruin probability of this model with heavy-tailed claim sizes.

In this paper, unless stated otherwise, all limits are for . For two positive functions and , if , then we write ; if , then we write ; if , then we write ; if , then we write . For a distribution V on , let , be its (right) tail.

For a distribution V on , if for any , then we say that V is heavy-tailed; otherwise, we say that V is light-tailed. In the following, we introduce some subclasses of heavy-tailed distribution class. Say that a distribution V on belongs to the subexponential distribution class , ifholds for some (or equivalently for all) , where is the n-fold convolution of V. Lemma 1.3.5(b) of Embrechts et al. [25] shows that if , then for any ,

Say that a distribution V on belongs to the long-tailed distribution class , if for any ,

By the uniform convergence theorem for slowly varying functions (Theorem A3.2 of Embrechts et al. [25]), this convergence also holds uniformly for every compact set of y. Say that a distribution V on belongs to the dominated varying distribution class , if for any ,

The above distribution classes have the following proper relation:(see, e.g., Embrechts et al. [25] and Klüppelberg and Stadtmüller [5]). The following is the main result of this paper.

Theorem 1. Consider the risk model (4). Assume that , , are i.i.d. and satisfy (6).(1)If , then for each ,(2)If , then for each ,

Because , from Theorem 1, we can obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 1. Consider the risk model (4). Assume that , , are i.i.d. and satisfy (6). If , then for each ,

Remark 1. When the claim sizes , and the interarrival times , are independent, Li [10] considered the risk model (4) for a linear premium income process , and subexponential claim sizes. He obtainedholds uniformly for t in a finite-time interval. This result indicates that when the claim sizes are heavy-tailed, the asymptotics of the finite-time ruin probability is insensitive to a Brownian perturbation. Theorem 1 confirms that when there exists the dependence structure (6) between the claim sizes , and their corresponding interarrival times , the asymptotics of the finite-time ruin probability is also insensitive to a Brownian perturbation for heavy-tailed claim sizes.

2. Proof of the Main Result

Lemma 1. Consider the risk model (4). Assume that , , are i.i.d. and satisfy (6).(1)If , then for each ,(2)If , then for each , the distribution of belongs to the class .

Proof. The result (1) is from Theorem 2.1 of Li et al. [23]. Now, we prove (2). Because , for each , relation (19) holds.
For every and any , . Because , by the local uniformity of the class , it holds uniformly for thatThis means that, for any , there exists such that for any and Hence, for any and By (22), it holds thatthat is,By (19) and (24), we know that the distribution of belongs to the class . Next, we will prove the distribution of belongs to the class . Because , for every , there exist constants and such that for any and ,Here, for any ,By (19) and (26), for every , it holds thatthat is, the distribution of belongs to the class .
The next lemma is Lemma 4.2 of Li et al. [23].

Lemma 2. Consider the risk model (4). Assume that , , are i.i.d. and satisfy (6). If , then for every , it holds for each that

The following lemma slightly extends the above lemma.

Lemma 3. Consider the risk model (4). Assume that , , are i.i.d. and satisfy (6). Suppose that ξ is a nonnegative random variable and independent of other random variables. If , then for every and each , it holds that

Proof. Because ξ is nonnegative, by Lemma 2, for every and each ,Next, we prove that, for every and each ,Because ξ is nonnegative and independent of other random variables, by Lemma 2, for every and each ,Because , by the dominated convergence theorem, for each , it holds uniformly for thatHence, for any , there exists a constant such that for any and ,For every and , set . By (6), (32), and (34), for every , each , and , it holds thatthat is, (31) holds.
The following lemma is derived from Proposition 1(a) of Embrechts et al. [26].

Lemma 4. Let be two distributions on . If and , then

For the above risk model, write

Let

The following lemma can be obtained from Theorem D.3 (ii) of Piterbarg [27].

Lemma 5. For each ,where is the tail of a standard normal distribution, and when , is (i.e., a limit as ).

Proof of Theorem 1. By Lemma 3, for each and any integer , it holds thatBy (4.19) and (4.20) of Li et al. [23], we obtain for each ,By (40)–(42), we obtain for each ,For each and , Lemma 5 impliesBy Lemma 1 (2), we know that the distribution of belongs to the class . Hence, by Lemmas 3 and 4, it holds thatHence, by (44), Lemmas 2 (1) and 4, we obtain

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11401418), the 333 Talent Training Project of Jiangsu Province, and the Jiangsu Province Key Discipline in the 13th Five-Year Plan.