Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2020 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Shear Strength Prediction Model of FRP Bar-Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups Investigator No. of specimens (MPa) (mm) (mm) (GPa) (%) (kN)Ashour and Kara [15 , 23 ] 18 2.5∼5.9 23∼50.2 150∼200 163∼371 32∼142 0.12∼1.39 9∼36.1 Gross [4 , 24 , 25 ] 42 4.1∼6.5 36.3∼81.4 65∼279 141∼225 41∼139 0.33∼2.56 8.8∼51 El-Sayedand El-Salakawy [26 –28 ] 18 3.1∼6.5 40∼63 250∼1000 155∼326 39∼135 0.39∼2.63 60∼190 Razaqpur et al. [10 ] 7 1.8∼4.2 40.5∼49 200 225 145 0.25∼0.88 36.1∼96.2 Benmokrane [29 ] 12 2.8∼3.7 34.1∼43.2 130∼160 310∼346 42∼120 0.72∼1.54 42.7∼63.7 Tureyen and Frosch [30 ] 6 3.4 39.7∼42.6 457 360 38∼47 0.96∼1.92 94.7∼177 Nanni [31 ] 3 2.6∼2.7 24.1 178 279∼287 40 0.77∼2.3 36.1∼53.4 Deitz and Harik [32 ] 5 4.5∼5.8 27∼30.8 305 158 40 0.73 26.8∼29.2 Mizukawa [33 ] 1 2.7 34.7 200 260 130 1.3 62.2 Duranovic [34 ] 3 3.7 32.9∼38.1 150 210 45∼130 1.31∼1.36 26.2∼62.2 Swamy [35 ] 2 3.2∼4.1 38∼39 154∼305 192∼222 34∼42 0.36∼1.55 19.5∼26.7 Suzuki [36 ] 3 3 34.3 150 250 105 1.51∼3.02 40.5∼46 Alam and Hussein [7 , 17 ] 37 1.5∼3.5 34.5∼88.3 250∼300 291∼744 47∼144 0.18∼1.47 43.7∼155.8 Nakamura and Higai [37 ] 2 3 22.7∼27.8 300 150 29 1.3∼1.8 33∼36 Bentz et al. [14 ] 6 3.3∼4.1 35∼46 450 188∼937 37 0.51∼2.54 54.5∼232 Baz̆ant and Yu [38 ] 1 3.1 40 450 970 40 0.46 136 Wakui and Tottori [39 ] 4 3.2 44.6∼46.9 200 325 58∼192 0.7∼0.9 87∼118 Nagasaka and Fukuyama [40 ] 2 3.1 22.9∼34.1 250 265 56 1.9 83∼113 Issa et al. [41 ] 6 5.7∼7 35.9 300 165∼170 48∼53 0.8∼4.12 29.3∼51.5 Tomlinson and Fam [42 ] 3 4.1∼4.5 56.5∼60 150 245∼270 70 0.39∼0.85 20.9∼29.2 Abed et al. [3 ] 9 1∼1.5 43∼65 200 230∼330 51 0.92∼1.84 116.6∼373.9 Guadagnini et al. [43 ] 3 1.1∼3.3 42.8∼47.7 150 223 45 1.28 27.2∼81 Kim and Jang[44 ] 40 1.5∼4.5 30∼40.3 150∼200 214∼216 40∼148 0.33∼0.79 16.6∼85.1 Olivito and Zuccarello [45 ] 20 5.6 20.4∼27.2 150 180 115 0.87∼1.45 16.6∼29.9 Matta et al. [46 ] 12 3.1 29.5∼59.7 114∼457 146∼883 41∼49 0.12∼0.28 17.9∼220.7 Thomas and Ramadass [9 ] 8 0.5∼1.8 40.6∼65.3 100∼170 270∼416 40 1.16∼1.75 30∼300 Wegian and Abdalla [47 ] 6 6.5∼9.5 32.5 1000 105∼155 42∼147 0.23∼0.96 23.5∼127 Andermatt and Lubell [11 ] 12 1.1∼2.1 39.9∼68.5 300∼310 257∼891 38∼43 1.47∼2.13 96∼1134.5 Huaxin and Genjin [13 ] 13 1.1∼2 34.9∼54.6 200 260∼360 52∼210 0.76∼1.16 83.8∼309.7 Xiaoliang and Wenjun [48 ] 3 2.5∼2.7 47.3∼50.4 300 300∼315 45 2.14∼5.62 85.3∼122.7 El Refai and Abed [8 ] 8 2.5∼3.3 49 152 195∼215 50 0.31∼1.53 16.9∼31.6 Chang and Seo [49 ] 14 5.8∼8 30 1200 130∼182 44∼50 0.24∼1.22 26.3∼159 Abdul-Salam et al. [50 ] 16 5.7∼6.3 41.3∼86.2 1000 134∼150 41∼148 0.51∼3.78 94∼213 Farghaly and Benmokrane [51 ] 4 1.1 38.7∼49.3 300 1088∼1111 48∼144 0.26∼1.24 595.5∼953 Ali et al. [12 ] 12 2.3∼3 13∼33.5 130 196∼200 52 0.3∼0.91 12.7∼39.4 Omeman et al. [1 ] 8 1.4∼2.3 34.7∼63.1 150 387∼662 134 1.13∼2.26 45.8∼234.1 Total 369 0.5∼9.5 13∼88.3 65∼1200 105∼1111 29∼210 0.12∼5.62 8.8∼1134.5
Note: if the concrete cylinder compressive strength
and modulus of elasticity of concrete
were not provided by the investigator while the concrete cube compressive strength
was only measured, it is assumed that
and
. If the unit of data was BS provided by the investigator, it is converted by the following factors: 1 ksi = 6.895 MPa, 1 in = 25.4 mm, and 1 kip = 4.448 KN.