Research Article

Shear Strength Prediction Model of FRP Bar-Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups

Table 1

Specimen details.

InvestigatorNo. of specimens (MPa) (mm) (mm) (GPa) (%) (kN)

Ashour and Kara [15, 23]182.5∼5.923∼50.2150∼200163∼37132∼1420.12∼1.399∼36.1
Gross [4, 24, 25]424.1∼6.536.3∼81.465∼279141∼22541∼1390.33∼2.568.8∼51
El-Sayedand El-Salakawy [2628]183.1∼6.540∼63250∼1000155∼32639∼1350.39∼2.6360∼190
Razaqpur et al. [10]71.8∼4.240.5∼492002251450.25∼0.8836.1∼96.2
Benmokrane [29]122.8∼3.734.1∼43.2130∼160310∼34642∼1200.72∼1.5442.7∼63.7
Tureyen and Frosch [30]63.439.7∼42.645736038∼470.96∼1.9294.7∼177
Nanni [31]32.6∼2.724.1178279∼287400.77∼2.336.1∼53.4
Deitz and Harik [32]54.5∼5.827∼30.8305158400.7326.8∼29.2
Mizukawa [33]12.734.72002601301.362.2
Duranovic [34]33.732.9∼38.115021045∼1301.31∼1.3626.2∼62.2
Swamy [35]23.2∼4.138∼39154∼305192∼22234∼420.36∼1.5519.5∼26.7
Suzuki [36]3334.31502501051.51∼3.0240.5∼46
Alam and Hussein [7, 17]371.5∼3.534.5∼88.3250∼300291∼74447∼1440.18∼1.4743.7∼155.8
Nakamura and Higai [37]2322.7∼27.8300150291.3∼1.833∼36
Bentz et al. [14]63.3∼4.135∼46450188∼937370.51∼2.5454.5∼232
Baz̆ant and Yu [38]13.140450970400.46136
Wakui and Tottori [39]43.244.6∼46.920032558∼1920.7∼0.987∼118
Nagasaka and Fukuyama [40]23.122.9∼34.1250265561.983∼113
Issa et al. [41]65.7∼735.9300165∼17048∼530.8∼4.1229.3∼51.5
Tomlinson and Fam [42]34.1∼4.556.5∼60150245∼270700.39∼0.8520.9∼29.2
Abed et al. [3]91∼1.543∼65200230∼330510.92∼1.84116.6∼373.9
Guadagnini et al. [43]31.1∼3.342.8∼47.7150223451.2827.2∼81
Kim and Jang[44]401.5∼4.530∼40.3150∼200214∼21640∼1480.33∼0.7916.6∼85.1
Olivito and Zuccarello [45]205.620.4∼27.21501801150.87∼1.4516.6∼29.9
Matta et al. [46]123.129.5∼59.7114∼457146∼88341∼490.12∼0.2817.9∼220.7
Thomas and Ramadass [9]80.5∼1.840.6∼65.3100∼170270∼416401.16∼1.7530∼300
Wegian and Abdalla [47]66.5∼9.532.51000105∼15542∼1470.23∼0.9623.5∼127
Andermatt and Lubell [11]121.1∼2.139.9∼68.5300∼310257∼89138∼431.47∼2.1396∼1134.5
Huaxin and Genjin [13]131.1∼234.9∼54.6200260∼36052∼2100.76∼1.1683.8∼309.7
Xiaoliang and Wenjun [48]32.5∼2.747.3∼50.4300300∼315452.14∼5.6285.3∼122.7
El Refai and Abed [8]82.5∼3.349152195∼215500.31∼1.5316.9∼31.6
Chang and Seo [49]145.8∼8301200130∼18244∼500.24∼1.2226.3∼159
Abdul-Salam et al. [50]165.7∼6.341.3∼86.21000134∼15041∼1480.51∼3.7894∼213
Farghaly and Benmokrane [51]41.138.7∼49.33001088∼111148∼1440.26∼1.24595.5∼953
Ali et al. [12]122.3∼313∼33.5130196∼200520.3∼0.9112.7∼39.4
Omeman et al. [1]81.4∼2.334.7∼63.1150387∼6621341.13∼2.2645.8∼234.1
Total3690.5∼9.513∼88.365∼1200105∼111129∼2100.12∼5.628.8∼1134.5

Note: if the concrete cylinder compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of concrete were not provided by the investigator while the concrete cube compressive strength was only measured, it is assumed that and . If the unit of data was BS provided by the investigator, it is converted by the following factors: 1 ksi = 6.895 MPa, 1 in = 25.4 mm, and 1 kip = 4.448 KN.