Research on Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of Resource Allocation Efficiency of Technology Innovation in the Aerospace Industry

Table 4

Evaluation results of the allocation of interprovincial technology innovation resource in the aerospace industry.

Year	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	Mean	Rank
Beijing	0.2614	0.3460	0.3354	0.2841	0.3420	0.3587	0.3022	0.3942	0.4629	0.4033	0.3490	19
Tianjin	0.3866	0.3855	0.3854	0.3908	0.3888	0.3868	0.3951	0.6226	0.9054	0.6885	0.4936	7
Hebei	0.3835	0.3810	0.3577	0.3584	0.4005	0.3709	0.3617	0.3747	0.3517	0.3492	0.3689	16
Liaoning	0.4076	0.9891	0.6700	0.6328	0.7464	0.6259	0.5727	0.6409	0.6554	0.3690	0.6310	2
Heilongjiang	0.4975	0.4770	0.5118	0.4160	0.4395	0.4367	0.3150	0.4048	0.3358	0.3491	0.4183	11
Shanghai	0.3028	0.3027	0.3985	0.3480	0.3790	0.3327	0.2867	0.2812	0.2968	0.2727	0.3201	20
Jiangsu	0.3665	0.6076	0.5147	0.5358	0.8346	0.6711	0.5974	0.4930	0.4332	0.4053	0.5459	5
Zhejiang	0.3954	0.4602	0.4745	0.4006	0.4065	0.3952	0.3924	0.3914	0.3899	0.3891	0.4095	12
Anhui	0.3948	0.4403	0.5575	0.4943	0.4077	0.4743	0.3857	0.3790	0.3690	0.3632	0.4266	10
Jiangxi	0.3255	0.4111	0.3937	0.4071	0.3868	0.5077	0.4378	0.4698	0.3855	0.2437	0.3969	13
Shandong	0.3702	0.3766	0.3734	0.3889	0.3713	0.3226	0.3774	0.4036	0.3950	0.3757	0.3755	14
Henan	0.3236	0.5474	0.7581	0.8489	0.7121	0.5387	0.4014	0.4879	0.4723	0.5056	0.5596	4
Hubei	0.2951	0.3976	0.3631	0.3621	0.4001	0.3365	0.3239	0.4037	0.3916	0.3686	0.3642	17
Hunan	0.7627	0.5169	0.5625	0.5056	0.4787	0.4352	0.4565	0.4744	0.3647	0.3548	0.4912	8
Guangdong	0.9423	0.5846	0.5065	0.3638	0.3447	0.3583	0.3570	0.6983	0.3607	0.6504	0.5167	6
Chongqing	0.3719	0.3600	0.3679	0.3558	0.3626	0.3620	0.3626	0.3675	0.3649	0.3613	0.3636	18
Sichuan	0.3095	0.8856	0.6417	0.4645	0.3644	0.3742	0.3847	0.5030	0.3949	0.4268	0.4749	9
Guizhou	0.5793	0.8361	0.7961	0.5740	0.4972	0.5186	0.4341	0.6312	0.5597	0.4732	0.5899	3
Shaanxi	0.2557	0.7401	0.7663	0.6202	0.7336	0.6422	0.8136	0.7598	0.6978	0.7116	0.6741	1
Gansu	0.3828	0.3906	0.3915	0.3815	0.3877	0.3782	0.3670	0.3606	0.3518	0.3400	0.3732	15

The evaluation results in Table 4 are reserved for four decimal places, the same as below.