Research Article
Chamber Optimization for Comprehensive Improvement of Cone Crusher Productivity and Product Quality
Table 3
Optimization calculation results.
| Design variable | (t·h−1) | (%) | (r·min−1) | (mm) | (°) | (°) | (mm) | (°) |
| Before optimization | 990 | 80.0 | 300 | 130 | 45 | 2 | 31.4 | 23 | Bottom angle | 1 | 1008 | 85.0 | 293 | 150 | 50 | 2 | 37.4 | 23 | 2 | 1126 | 81.2 | 275 | 150 | 55 | 2 | 44.8 | 23 | 3 | 1238 | 78.0 | 260 | 150 | 60 | 2 | 54.3 | 23 | Parallel zone | 1 | 998 | 82.0 | 300 | 140 | 50 | 2 | 37.4 | 23 | 2 | 896 | 87.2 | 300 | 170 | 50 | 2 | 37.4 | 23 | 3 | 850 | 89.6 | 300 | 190 | 50 | 2 | 37.4 | 23 | Eccentric angle | 1 | 710 | 77.3 | 320 | 150 | 50 | 1.4 | 30.8 | 23 | 2 | 890 | 80.3 | 320 | 150 | 50 | 1.6 | 32.2 | 23 | 3 | 986 | 81.6 | 320 | 150 | 50 | 1.8 | 34.5 | 23 | After optimization | 1151 | 83.2 | 285 | 150 | 55 | 2 | 44.8 | 23 |
|
|