Research Article
Research on High-Speed Railway Freight Train Organization Method considering Different Transportation Product Demands
Table 7
The loading rate of the train plan and its remaining tonnage situation.
| | Direction | Section | Beijing–Shijiazhuang | Shijiazhuang–Zhengzhou | Zhengzhou–Wuhan | Wuhan–Changsha | Changsha–Guangzhou |
| | Down | Section discharge (t) | 261 | 259.98 | 251.23 | 229.22 | 229.22 | | Section loading capacity (t) | 261 | 261 | 261 | 261 | 261 | | Section loading rate (%) | 100 | 99.6 | 96.25 | 87.82 | 87.82 | | Line weighted loading rate (%) | 90.97 | | Remaining tonnage | Train 1 | — | 1.02 | 7.77 | 9.02 | 6.23 | | Train 5 | — | — | — | 22.76 | 22.76 | | Train 6 | — | — | — | — | 2.79 |
| | Up | Section discharge (t) | 231.81 | 244.13 | 207.67 | 241.21 | 258.19 | | Section loading capacity (t) | 261 | 261 | 261 | 261 | 261 | | Section loading rate (%) | 88.81 | 93.53 | 79.56 | 92.41 | 98.92 | | Line weighted loading rate (%) | 87.92 | | Remaining tonnage | Train 1 | — | 7.20 | 24.14 | 19.79 | 2.81 | | Train 2 | 29.19 | 4.14 | 29.19 | — | — | | Train 5 | — | 5.53 | — | — | — |
|
|
