Research Article

A Study of Flexible Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Various Heterogeneous Labors

Table 2

The optimal solution and makespan with  = 3, n = 5.

Amount of hired heterogeneous labors (E)Arrangement of laborsDispatching ruleCmaxOptimum solutionCPU time
( = 1, m = 3)( = 2, m = 2)( = 3, m = 2)(Total cost)(ms)

0(7, 0, 0)RRRRRRR60.56352.5
1(6, 0, 1)RRRRRRO61.566186.78296.86
(6, 1, 0)RRRRRRD61.946070.37296.87
2(5, 0, 2)RRORRRO63.376083.76265.62
(5, 1, 1)RRDRRRO64.566036.36297.34
(5, 2, 0)RRDRRRD62.625698.42281.24
3(4, 0, 3)RRORORO63.865842.96281.25
(4, 1, 2)RRORDRO64.465736.72249.99
(4, 2, 1)RRDRDRO60.845262.88265.76
(4, 3, 0)RRDRDRD66.365573.82296.86
4(3, 0, 4)ROORORO64.685626.94218.74
(3, 1, 3)RDORORO65.485532.64249.99
(3, 2, 2)RDORDRO66.95485.96249.99
(3, 3, 1)RDDRDRO67.977306.78249.99
(3, 4, 0)RDDRDRD68.367177.28249.99
5(2, 0, 5)ROOOORO67.857497.7297.21
(2, 1, 4)ROODORO68.097354.1296.87
(2, 2, 3)RDODORO67.97163.14328.11
(2, 3, 2)RDODDRO68.417045.97328.11
(2, 4, 1)RDDDDRO68.716905.1265.81
(2, 5, 0)RDDDDRD69.866845.79296.87
6(1, 0, 6)OOOOORO69.777395.09484.36
(1, 1, 5)DOOOORO68.687107.86281.24
(1, 2, 4)DOODORO68.016869.26312.49
(1, 3, 3)DDODORO71.026994.98281.24
(1, 4, 2)DDODDRO69.646684.96234.74
(1, 5, 1)DDDDDRO68.676420.88415.25
(1, 6, 0)DDDDDRD72.386586.49389.7
7(0, 0, 7)OOOOOOO71.177224.01292.84
(0, 1, 6)OOOOODO71.177046.08283.21
(0, 2, 5)DOOOODO71.176868.15311.78
(0, 3, 4)DOODODO71.176690.22319
(0, 4, 3)DDODODO78.539384.04285.18
(0, 5, 2)DDODDDO71.466359.72316.43
(0, 6, 1)DDDDDDO73.828452.39287.57
(0, 7, 0)DDDDDDD77.178643.32338.08

Note. The grey shading represents the minimal makespan among all combinations.