Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

Table 1

The index system of human reliability evaluation for complex interface design.

Target layer	Criterion layer	Index layer
The index system of human reliability evaluation	C1 misperception	L11 fuzzy semantics; L12 limited vision; L13 optical illusion; L14 weak visibility; L15 cognitive biases
	C2 memory lapse	L21 thinking load; L22 forgotten; L23 false memories; L24 inaccurate recall; L25 lack of memory assistance; L26 time pressure
	C3 carelessness	L31 diminished intention; L32 overconfidence; L33 interference; L34 nervous at a loss; L35 information overload
	C4 improper decisions making	L41 wrong planning target; L42 information misunderstanding; L43 the empirical; L44 no plan; L45 plan missing; L46 reasonably planned but not executed according to the plan
	C5 improper operation	L51 inadequate training; L52 improper operating procedure; L53 taking shortcuts; L54 habitual control; L55 illegal manipulation; L56 lack of operational knowledge; L57 wrong operation time
	C6 improper interface layout design	L61 improper functional partitioning; L62 indistinguishable different information; L63 poor logic of information arrangement; L64 unreasonable interface hierarchy; L65 unreasonable interface link order
	C7 improper icon and text display design	L71 poor readability of characters; L72 inscrutable icon; L73 inscrutable jargon; L74 the icon not matching the task properly; L75 jargon not matching the task properly; L76 contradictory tag
	C8 improper prompt feedback	L81 no prompt information; L82 unreasonable time of feedback response; L83 indistinguishable feedback; L84 perceived redundant information; L85 wrong feedback prompt