Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Interfaces I and II</td><td class="align_center"><span style="width: 37.4644ptpx;"><svg height="15.0796pt" id="M101" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.8981 37.4644 15.0796" width="37.4644pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><rect height="0.65243" width="10.3577" x="0" y="-11.1958"></rect><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M600 480C600 590 528 650 384 650H143L137 622C222 614 225 607 210 531L130 127C113 41 106 36 23 28L17 0H294L300 28C204 36 195 42 212 127L243 284L314 263C327 263 339 263 352 264C465 271 600 337 600 480ZM508 481C508 351 402 304 329 304C289 304 265 311 250 317L295 559C302 594 310 606 323 611C335 616 350 619 367 619C455 619 508 573 508 481Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.656,3.132)"><path d="M308 0V33C226 39 217 43 217 128V521C217 606 226 611 308 617V650H39V617C122 611 130 606 130 521V128C130 43 122 39 39 33V0H308Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,13.263,0)"><path d="M535 230V280H52V230H535Z"></path></g><rect height="0.65243" width="13.5364" x="23.7997" y="-11.1958"></rect><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,23.8,0)"><path d="M600 480C600 590 528 650 384 650H143L137 622C222 614 225 607 210 531L130 127C113 41 106 36 23 28L17 0H294L300 28C204 36 195 42 212 127L243 284L314 263C327 263 339 263 352 264C465 271 600 337 600 480ZM508 481C508 351 402 304 329 304C289 304 265 311 250 317L295 559C302 594 310 606 323 611C335 616 350 619 367 619C455 619 508 573 508 481Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,30.456,3.132)"><path d="M308 0V33C226 39 217 43 217 128V521C217 606 226 611 308 617V650H39V617C122 611 130 606 130 521V128C130 43 122 39 39 33V0H308Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,33.622,3.132)"><path d="M308 0V33C226 39 217 43 217 128V521C217 606 226 611 308 617V650H39V617C122 611 130 606 130 521V128C130 43 122 39 39 33V0H308Z"></path></g></svg></span></td><td class="align_center"><i>p</i></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">B and A</td><td class="align_center">7.0000</td><td class="align_center">0.0010</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">A and C</td><td class="align_center">6.3750</td><td class="align_center">0.0020</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">B and C</td><td class="align_center">13.3750</td><td class="align_center">≤0.001</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Multiple comparisons of fixation point failure for three different types of interface design.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design 