Research Article
Type-2 Fuzzy Neural System for Diagnosis of Diabetes
Table 6
Comparative results of different models using Pima datasets (768 data samples).
| | Authors | Methodology | Accuracy |
| | Choubey and Paul [3] | MLP NN | 0.79 | | Polat et al. [8] | SVM | 0.79 | | Beloufa and Fayssal [19] | Artificial bee colony | 0.84 | | Bashir et al. [43] | HM-BagMoov | 0.86 | | Bozkurt et al. [44] | ANN | 0.76 | | Tand and Tseng [45] | Genetic algorithm | 0.81 | | Aslam et al. [46] | 3-step genetic programming | 0.87 | | Nabi et al. [47] | 4 machine learning combinations | 0.80 | | Maniruzzaman et al. [48] | Quadratic discriminant analysis | 0.82 | | Mercaldo et al. [49] | Deep learning | 0.77 | | Rabina and Chopra [50] | Multi-layer perceptron | 0.77 | | Sreedevi and Padmavathamma [51] | Genetic algorithm | 0.72 | | Sa’di et al. [52] | Naïve Bayes | 0.76 | | Current research | T2FNN (32 rules) | 0.87 | | Current research | T2FNN (80 rules) | 0.969 | | Current research | T2FNN (100 rules) | 0.991 |
|
|