A New Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for the Selection of Sponge City Schemes with Shapley–Choquet Aggregation Operators

Table 5

Expert weight interval value.

Decision-making level	First-level indexes	Second-level indexes	Expert weight
			Best project scheme	Engineering indicators C1	Cost input C11	[0.2, 0.5]	[0.4, 0.6]	[0.2, 0.3]
Project duration C12	[0.1, 0.4]	[0.3, 0.5]			[0.1, 0.4]
Operational costs C13	[0.3, 0.5]	[0.2, 0.3]			[0.2, 0.4]
Flood storage capacity C2	Water retention capacity C21	[0.2, 0.4]		[0.1, 0.3]	[0.3, 0.5]
	Flood control of vegetation C22	[0.3, 0.5]		[0.2, 0.3]	[0.1, 0.3]
	Urban water network connection C23	[0.2, 0.3]		[0.4, 0.5]	[0.2, 0.4]
	Use of canals, rivers, and lakes C24	[0.3, 0.6]		[0.2, 0.4]	[0.5, 0.6]
Ecological environmentC3	Biological water purification C31	[0.2, 0.5]		[0.4, 0.5]	[0.5, 0.6]
	Soil protection C32	[0.2, 0.5]		[0.4, 0.5]	[0.4, 0.5]
	Wetland utilization C33	[0.3, 0.5]		[0.4, 0.6]	[0.2, 0.4]
Rainwater collection and utilization C4	Water-holding capacity C41	[0.1, 0.4]		[0.2, 0.4]	[0.2, 0.5]
	Water circulation C42	[0.3, 0.5]		[0.2, 0.4]	[0.1, 0.5]
	Rainwater collection C43	[0.4, 0.5]		[0.3, 0.5]	[0.2, 0.4]