Research Article
Identification of Driver Distraction Based on SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study
Table 4
Results of distraction classification.
| | LSTM-NN | | Type | Accuracy | Recall | FI-score | G-mean |
| | 2 | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | | 88% | 92% | 90% | 89% | 89% | 91% | 89% | 90% | | 4 | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | | 74% | 71% | 77% | 91 | 82% | 79% | 84% | 92 | 78% | 75% | 80% | 91 | 77% | 76% | 80% | 91% |
| | SVM | | Type | Accuracy | Recall | FI-score | G-mean |
| | 2 | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | | 76% | 82% | 78% | 80% | 77% | 81% | 76% | 81% | | 4 | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | | 72% | 69% | 64% | 80 | 56% | 66% | 68% | 85 | 64% | 67% | 66% | 83 | 63% | 67% | 66% | 82% |
| | AdaBoost | | Type | Accuracy | Recall | FI-score | G-mean |
| | 2 | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | Distraction | Normal | | 77% | 87% | 81% | 86% | 79% | 87% | 79% | 86% | | 4 | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | FDL | FDS | FDU | ND | | 73% | 71% | 68% | 86 | 69% | 75% | 70% | 85 | 71% | 73% | 69% | 86 | 72% | 72% | 68% | 86% |
|
|