Research Article
Influence of Wave-Absorbing Chamber Width on the Wave Attenuation Performance of Perforated Caisson Sitting on Rubble-Mound Foundation
Figure 5
Comparison of the reflection coefficient Kr: ●, experimental results as hm = 0.10 m; ○, numerical results as hm = 0.10 m; (—), calculation results by Xing as hm = 0.10 m; ■, experimental results as hm = 0.15 m; □, numerical results as hm = 0.15 m; (--), calculation results by Xing as hm = 0.15 m; ▲, experimental results as h hm = 0.20 m; △, numerical results as hm = 0.20 (m) (-.), calculation results by Xing as hm = 0.20 m.
| (a) |
| (b) |
| (c) |
| (d) |
| (e) |
| (f) |