Research Article
Systematic Approach of TOPSIS Decision-Making for Construction Method Based on Risk Reduction Feedback of Extended QFD-FMEA
Table 9
Alternative A001 basic cause ratio analysis table by accident type (Step 5 of extended QFD-FMEA).
| Number | Hazard factors | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | Component value (sum) |
| A01_01 | H_04 (0.50) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_08 (0.50) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 1.50 | 1.50 | 3.00 | 0.00 | (6.00) | Composition ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.00 | (1.00) |
| A01_02 | H_03 (0.30) | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_12 (0.70) | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 1.34 | 0.50 | 0.22 | 0.34 | (2.40) | Composition ratio | 0.56 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.14 | (1.00) |
| A01_03 | H_04 (0.30) | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_08 (0.20) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_12 (0.50) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 1.60 | 0.72 | 1.68 | 4.00 | (8.00) | Composition ratio | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.50 | (1.00) |
| A01_04 | H_05 (1.00) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | (2.00) | Composition ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | (1.00) |
| A01_05 | H_01 (1.00) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.60 | 0.00 | (3.60) | Composition ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | (1.00) |
| A01_06 | H_03 (1.00) | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 0.00 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (8.00) | Composition ratio | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (1.00) |
| A01_07 | H_08 (0.70) | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_14 (0.30) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.00 | (0.80) | Composition ratio | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.00 | (1.00) |
| A01_08 | H_06 (0.50) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | H_08 (0.50) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Configuration value | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | (2.00) | Composition ratio | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | (1.00) |
|
|