Research Article

[Retracted] The Embedding of Sports Social Organizations in Rural Governance Based on the Collaborative Governance Model of Multiple Subjects

Table 4

Setting of variables and assignments.

Variable typeVariable nameNumber of variables statisticsAssignment

Result variableCGBMPMultiple subjects participate in governance continuously, and the degree of participation is high and the governance effectiveness is good1
Multi-organizers can actively participate in governance, but there are limitations, and the effectiveness of governance is good0.8
Multiple subjects participate in governance but not actively, and the governance effect is average0.8
Single-actor governance0
Conditional variableRFSubjects trust the government, experts or other participating subjects and are willing to share resources or strengthen their own behavior to improve cooperation0.8
The subject trusts the government, experts, or other participating subjects in general, and can provide certain resources1
Subjects try to outperform or overpower other subjects’ psychological needs and behavioral activities and have a competitive mindset for cooperation0.6
Lack of trust among subjects, unwillingness to share resources and strengthen their own cooperative behavior0
PTEThe subject is able to make rapid judgments about the characteristics and severity of risk events and is satisfied with the quality and needs of governance1
The subject is able to judge the characteristics and severity of the risk event and is basically satisfied with the quality and needs of the governance0.8
The subject is able to make basic judgments about the characteristics and severity of the risk event and is partially satisfied with the quality and needs of the governance0.6
The subject can hardly judge the characteristics and severity of the risk event and is not satisfied with the quality and needs of governance0
TIFEffective dynamic feedback and timely dialogue between subjects, and access to all information0.8
Dynamic feedback and dialogue between subjects and access to relevant information1
Subjects can have limited dialogue with each other and obtain some necessary information but not all0.6
Subjects are constrained to express their views and keep each other’s information confidential0
EFSubjects actively participate in the act of public crisis management and do their best to accomplish the task1
The subject has the will to participate in public crisis management behavior0.8
Subjects are unwilling to participate in public crisis management behavior0
CLFThe dynamic and uncertain nature of the public crisis management process leads to a very complex decision-making process and uncertain results for the governing body1
The decision making of public crisis management subjects is complex and the results are uncertain0.8
The decision making of public crisis management actors is relatively complex and the results are uncertain0.4
The decision making of public crisis management actors is simple but the results of management are uncertain0.6
The decision making of public crisis management actors is simple, and the results of management are controllable0
SFThe system of public crisis management is well established, and the cooperation among the subjects involved in collaborative management is good, and the connection between the subjects is strong1
There is a positive team spirit in the process of public crisis management and it can stimulate the cooperation among the subjects0.8
The links between the subjects involved in collaborative management are relatively strong0.6
Independent action of the subjects involved in governance0
TNFThe ability of participating governance entities to monitor risk information in real-time, deal with security incidents quickly and ensure the safety of people’s lives and property to the maximum extent possible1
Participating governance entities can monitor risk information, deal with security incidents, and complete risk analysis results0.8
The ability of participating governance entities to ensure accurate and timely distribution of relief materials in the event of a public crisis0.6
The participating governance body can complete the rescue work after the occurrence of the public crisis event0.6
The governance body cannot ensure the safety of people’s lives and property in the event of a public crisis0