Research Article
Urban-Rural Logistics Coupling Coordinated Development and Urban-Rural Integrated Development: Measurement, Influencing Factors, and Countermeasures
Table 4
Coupling and coupling coordination type of the urban-rural logistics composite systems.
| Year | Uu | Ur | C | Coupling type | T | D | Coupling coordination type |
| 2011 | 0.101 | 0.280 | 0.882 | High level | 0.190 | 0.410 | Close to incongruity | 2012 | 0.165 | 0.406 | 0.906 | High level | 0.286 | 0.509 | Primary coupling coordination | 2013 | 0.187 | 0.427 | 0.920 | High level | 0.307 | 0.532 | Primary coupling coordination | 2014 | 0.238 | 0.511 | 0.931 | High level | 0.374 | 0.590 | Primary coupling coordination | 2015 | 0.424 | 0.421 | 1.000 | High level | 0.422 | 0.650 | Intermediate coupling coordination | 2016 | 0.538 | 0.407 | 0.990 | High level | 0.473 | 0.684 | Intermediate coupling coordination | 2017 | 0.591 | 0.466 | 0.993 | High level | 0.528 | 0.724 | Good coupling coordination | 2018 | 0.694 | 0.581 | 0.996 | High level | 0.638 | 0.797 | Good coupling coordination | 2019 | 0.892 | 0.662 | 0.989 | High level | 0.777 | 0.877 | Extreme coupling coordination | 2020 | 0.879 | 0.637 | 0.987 | High level | 0.758 | 0.865 | Extreme coupling coordination |
|
|