Rural Tourism Public Service Performance Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>U</i><sub>1</sub></td><td class="align_center"><i>U</i><sub>11</sub></td><td class="align_center"><i>U</i><sub>12</sub></td><td class="align_center"><i>U</i><sub>13</sub></td><td class="align_center"><i>U</i><sub>14</sub></td><td class="align_center"><span style="width: 13.9727ptpx;"><svg height="11.927pt" id="M24" style="vertical-align:-3.291101pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 13.9727 11.927" width="13.9727pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M962 650H739L732 622L760 619C812 613 819 604 798 552C760 457 671 267 606 131H604L511 638H480L237 131H233L183 554C177 607 183 614 226 619L248 622L257 650H24L17 622C88 615 92 611 103 524L173 -11H203L450 491H453L543 -11H575L839 529C882 609 886 613 953 622L962 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,10.777,3.132)"><path d="M250 606C250 634 233 656 203 656C168 656 146 618 146 593C146 564 169 545 192 545C227 545 250 573 250 606ZM227 95L212 119C187 98 152 71 135 71C129 71 128 78 134 102L207 373C219 418 217 451 194 451C165 451 92 411 30 351L44 326C77 353 106 371 114 371C124 371 121 357 117 341L55 97C32 5 46 -12 70 -12C108 -12 191 51 227 95Z"></path></g></svg></span></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>U</i><sub>11</sub></td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">1/5</td><td class="align_center">1/2</td><td class="align_center">1/9</td><td class="align_center">0.055</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>U</i><sub>12</sub></td><td class="align_center">7</td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">2</td><td class="align_center">1/4</td><td class="align_center">0.252</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>U</i><sub>13</sub></td><td class="align_center">4</td><td class="align_center">1/2</td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">1/5</td><td class="align_center">0.113</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><i>U</i><sub>14</sub></td><td class="align_center">9</td><td class="align_center">4</td><td class="align_center">5</td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">0.580</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Total</td><td class="align_center"> </td><td class="align_center"> </td><td class="align_center"> </td><td class="align_center"> </td><td class="align_center">1</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Weight of infrastructure services indicators in second level indicators.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Rural Tourism Public Service Performance Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process 