Research Article
On Nonlocal Vertical and Horizontal Bending of a Micro-Beam
Table 1
Comparisons between analytical and numerical results of
.
| /nm | Present | FEM | Error (%) |
| P = 0.2 N | −1.36339 | −1.37812 | 1.08 | P = 0.4 N | −1.49878 | −1.51030 | 0.77 | P = 0.6 N | −1.66326 | −1.68113 | 1.07 | P = 0.8 N | −1.86729 | −1.88905 | 1.17 | P = 1.0 N | −2.12704 | −2.14398 | 0.80 | P = 1.2 N | −2.46890 | −2.50141 | 0.91 | P = 1.4 N | −2.93903 | −2.95286 | 1.32 | P = 1.6 N | −3.62616 | −3.65537 | 0.81 | P = 1.8 N | −4.72538 | −4.80162 | 1.61 | P = 2.0 N | −6.76571 | −6.83209 | 0.98 | P = 2.2 N | −11.85885 | −12.14358 | 2.40 | P = 2.4 N | −47.18072 | −48.76379 | 3.36 | P = 2.6 N | 24.05148 | 24.82850 | 3.23 | P = 2.8 N | 9.61692 | 9.83044 | 2.22 | P = 3.0 N | 6.02361 | 6.20673 | 3.04 |
|
|