Analysis of Existence and Stability Results for Impulsive Fractional Integro-Differential Equations Involving the Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo Derivative under Integral Boundary Conditions

Reunsumrit, Jiraporn; Karthikeyann, Panjaiyan; Poornima, Sadhasivam; Karthikeyan, Kulandhaivel; Sitthiwirattham, Thanin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5449680

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Preliminaries Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5449680 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5449680

Analysis of Existence and Stability Results for Impulsive Fractional Integro-Differential Equations Involving the Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo Derivative under Integral Boundary Conditions

Jiraporn Reunsumrit,¹Panjaiyan Karthikeyann,²Sadhasivam Poornima,²Kulandhaivel Karthikeyan,³and Thanin Sitthiwirattham⁴

Academic Editor: Amin Jajarmi

Received19 Sept 2022

Revised08 Nov 2022

Accepted10 Nov 2022

Published12 Dec 2022

Abstract

In this study, we consider the existence results of solutions of impulsive Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo fractional integro-differential equations with integral boundary conditions. Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem and the Banach contraction principle are used to prove the existence and uniqueness of results. Moreover, we also establish Hyers–Ulam stability for this problem. An example is also presented at the end.

1. Introduction

The concept of derivatives and integrals of any arbitrary real or complex order is called fractional calculus, and initially, it was proposed in works by mathematicians such as L’Hôpital, Liouville, Leibniz, Riemann, and Abel. The nonlocality of fractional derivatives, a characteristic inherent to many complex systems, makes them important for modeling phenomena in numerous disciplines of engineering and science. A significant study had already been conducted in this area [1–7]. Fractional derivatives provide more realistic representations of real-world behavior than ordinary derivatives when dealing with some phenomena because they consider the global evolution of the system rather than just local dynamics. In [8], Podlubny has examined the methods and applications of fractional derivatives and fractional differential equations (FDEs). Many authors have investigated the applications of FDEs [9–11].

There has recently been a lot of attention drawn to the quadratic perturbation of nonlinear differential equations also known as hybrid differential equations. Due to the inclusion of several dynamic systems as special instances, research on hybrid differential equations is significant. Hilal and Kajouni [12] have discussed boundary value problems (BVPs) for hybrid fractional differential equations (H-FDEs). In [13], the authors have studied on the experimental applications of hybrid functions to FDEs.

There are numerous applications of BVPs within the field of applied mathematics. For instance, concentration in chemical or biological issues and nonlinear sources produce nonlinear diffusion and the theory of thermal ignition of gases. In addition, BVPs with integral boundary conditions have numerous contributions of mathematical modeling to the heat conduction process, hemic conduction process, and hydrodynamics issues. Many authors have investigated FDEs with boundary conditions [14–23].

The Atangana–Baleanu derivative is being explored to develop a model that depicts the behavior of conventional viscoelastic materials, thermal media, and other materials. The suggested mechanism is capable of representing material heterogeneities as well as some media or structures at various scales. In [24, 25], the authors have discussed the existing results on the Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo derivative. The entire description of memory inside structures and media with various scales, which cannot be represented by conventional fractional derivatives or those of the Caputo–Fabrizio type, is made possible by new kernel’s nonlocality. Additionally, we think that Atangana–Baleanu derivatives can be useful in the investigation of some materials’ microstructural behavior, particularly in cases where nonlocal exchanges are involved because they play a key role in establishing the material’s physical states. To have a clear picture, in [26], Algahtani has compared the Caputo–Fabrizio derivative and Atangana–Baleanu with the fractional order Allen–Cahn model.

The Mittag–Leffler function has long been recognized as being extremely beneficial in fractional calculus. Additionally, it has had a substantial impact on the definitions of other fractional differential integrals. It has been studied by many authors [27–31]. To put it simply, fractional differential models and systems generalize ordinary and partial differential systems. Generalization is caused by the FDEs of noninteger (fractional) order, and their nonlocality always aids in simulating nonlocal interactions in nature. Blood flows, natural structures such as heartbeats, control theory, hypothetical physical science, mechanical frameworks, designing, population dynamics, biotechnology, medical science, economics, and various other real-world things are examples of things that change quickly. Ulam discovered that the question of whether a proposition’s claim genuinely obeys, or generally holds, if the hypothesis is slightly altered, is a prevalent and important one in many domains and has drawn the attention of many scholars. That is referred to as the Hyers-Ulam stability problem [32–38].

In [39], Rozi and others examined the following BVPs under the fractional derivative:where . They investigated the existence and uniqueness of the aforementioned problem and also proved the U-H type of stability.

In [40], Devi and Kumar studied the existence and uniqueness of results for integro FDEs with the Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative:where is the left AB-Caputo derivative of fractional order . The continuous functions are and and and .

Based on the aforementioned work, we consider the BVP for impulsive Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo fractional integro-differential equations:where is the AB-Caputo derivative of fractional order , and is a continuous function. and . , and and indicate the right and left hand limits of at .

The structure of the study is as follows. In Section 2, we recall some fundamental definitions, notations, and preliminary facts. Section 3 is focused on the existing results for the fractional integro-differential systems with the derivative. Section 4 is dedicated to establishing the results of Hyers–Ulam stability. The application of our theoretical results is given in Section 5.

2. Preliminaries

We examine several fundamental findings that are applied to our major study in this part.

Definition 1 (see [25]). We assume with ; the fractional order derivative is denoted aswhere the Mittag–Leffler function is and the normalization function is .

Definition 2 (see [25]). The equivalent integral for is written aswhere the fractional integral is denoted as .

Lemma 1 (see [31]). We assume the problem as

Given the conditions under which the RHS disappears at time , the solution is provided by

Here, we indicate the Banach space with .

Theorem 1 (Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem [4]). We consider a convex set of with a mapping such that(i) for each (ii) is continuous and compact(iii) is contractionThen, has at least one fixed point.

3. Main Results

Here, we look into the prerequisites for the existence of a solution to problem (3).

Lemma 2 (see [39]). We assume the linear BVPs with nonlinear integral boundary conditions, and if , we obtain

Then, the solution is given by

Proof. By Lemma 1, we can instantly get the result of (9).

Corollary 1. According to Lemma 2, the solution of problem (3) is provided by

To gain the interconnected results, the hypothesis must be true: (A1) There are constants , and , where . (A2) There are constants , and , where . (A3) There are constants , where . (A4) There are constants , and , where . (A5) There are constants , and if , then we obtain for all and . (A6) Any positive , we take , where , Then, is bounded, closed, and convex subset in .

If (A5) is satisfied, then

It holds true for any and .

By (10), we define by

Theorem 2. Under hypothesis (A1) and (A6), the solution of problem (3) is unique if

Proof. For any , we obtainIf , from (19), we haveThus, we obtainHence, we obtainTherefore, is a contraction mapping, and the solution of problem (3) is unique.

Theorem 3. By hypotheses (A1) to (A6), we get

Then, there is at least one solution for problem (3). We define the operators as follows:

Proof. Step 1:for any , we obtainLet , and from (26), we haveWhen we simplify, we obtainWe havewhere is therefore a contraction.Step 2:to determine the necessary condition with regards to , let , and thus, based on (26), we can obtainThus, is bounded. Now, we show that is continuous.
Consider for any , then for every Thus, as , and hence, is continuous.Step 3:to show equicontinuity, we take , and we haveObviously, from (33), we see that , and the RHS of the inequality implies zeroThe operator is uniformly continuous, and also, is compact. By the Arzel -Ascoli theorem, is completely continuous. Hence, given problem (3) has at least one solution.

4. Stability Results

This section focuses on showing the results of Hyers–Ulam stability for problem (3).

Definition 3. We consider problem (3), and the given inequality isThe constant is , and there exists a solution such thatThen, given problem (3) is Hyers–Ulam stable. Moreover, if there is function which is nondecreasing andwith ;then, problem (3) is generalized Hyers–Ulam stable. The provided result is required.

Remark 1. Let and , where is a function, and if it is independent of , then(i) for all (ii).

Lemma 3 (see [39]). We consider the H-FDE problem:

Then, the solution is

Moreover, from (39), we have

Proof. By Lemma 2, we obtain (39). Furthermore, by Remark 1, result (40) is evident.

Theorem 4. We consider H-FDE problem (3):

The solution of (3) is Hyers–Ulam and generalized Hyers–Ulam stable, under Lemma 3, if

Proof. If is any solution of (3) and is at most one result of (3), thenHence, using , we getUsing hypothesis (A1)–(A4), after a few reductions in (44), by Lemma 3, we getHence, from (45), we getHence, the solution is Hyers–Ulam stable. Moreover, for generalized Hyers–Ulam stability, we getThen, by using (46), we obtainwhere is a nondecreasing function, and there exists a function . Therefore, the needed result for generalized Hyers–Ulam stability is obtained.

5. Example

We assume the following H-FDEwhereand

Thus, we have and choose .

Here, we examine the conditions of the theorems and get

Theorem 2’s prerequisite is met. Hence, system (49) has a solution that is unique.

Theorem 3’s prerequisite is met, and then given system (49) has at least one solution. Next is H-U stability:

Thus, system (49) is Hyers–Ulam and generalized Hyers–Ulam stable.

6. Conclusion

Hybrid fractional integro-differential equations with integral boundary conditions problem were considered. By using the Banach fixed-point theorem and Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem, existence and uniqueness of solutions were established. In addition, Hyers–Ulam stability was developed. The obtained results have been validated by proving the appropriate problem. In the future, we extend our work with delay terms.

Data Availability

There is no data used for this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF) and King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok with Contract no. KMUTNB-FF-65-49.

References

A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.
S. Abbas, M. Benchohra, and G. M. N’Guérékata, Topics in Fractional Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2012.
M. Rahimy, “Applications of fractional differential equations,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 50, pp. 2453–2461, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Lakshmikantham and A. S. Vatsala, “Basic theory of fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2677–2682, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Lakshmikantham and D. J. Vasundhara, “Theory of fractional differential equations in Banach space,” Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, vol. 1, no. 45, pp. 38–45, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
N. H. Tuan, D. Baleanu, T. N. Thach, D. O’Regan, and N. H. Can, “Final value problem for nonlinear time fractional reaction-diffusion equation with discrete data,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 376, pp. 112883–883, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Miller and B. Ross, Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, Wiley, New York, 1993.
I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1998.
D. Baleanu, S. Etemad, and S. Rezapour, “A hybrid Caputo fractional modeling for thermostat with hybrid boundary value conditions,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 64, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mohammadi, S. Kumar, S. Rezapour, and S. Etemad, “A theoretical study of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional modeling for hearing loss due to Mumps virus with optimal control,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 144, Article ID 110668, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Matar, M. I. Abbas, J. Alzabut, M. K. A. Kaabar, S. Etemad, and S. Rezapour, “Investigation of the p-Laplacian nonperiodic nonlinear boundary value problem via generalized Caputo fractional derivatives,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 68, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hilal and A. Kajouni, “Boundary value problems for hybrid differential equations with fractional order,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2015, no. 1, p. 183, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nouri, D. Baleanu, and L. Torkzadeh, “Study on application of hybrid functions to fractional differential equations,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction A-Science, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1343–1350, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karthikeyan, J. Reunsumrit, P. Karthikeyan, S. Poornima, D. Tamizharasan, and T. Sitthiwirattham, “Panjaiyan Karthikeyan and etc Existence results for impulsive fractional integrodifferential equations involving integral boundary conditions,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2022, Article ID 6599849, pp. 1–12, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ahmad and R. Luca, “Existence of solutions for a system of fractional differential equations with coupled nonlocal boundary conditions,” Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 423–441, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ahmad and J. J. Nieto, “Existence of solutions for anti-periodic boundary value problems involving fractional differential equations via Leray-Schauder degree theory,” Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 295–304, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Wattanakejorn, P. Karthikeyann, S. Poornima, K. Karthikeyan, and T. Sitthiwirattham, “Sadhasivam Poornima and etc., Existence solutions for implicit fractional relaxation differential equations with impulsive delay boundary conditions,” Axioms, vol. 11, p. 611, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Lv, I. Ahmad, J. Xu, and Akbar Zada, “Analysis of a Hybrid Coupled System of -Caputo Fractional Derivatives with Generalized Slit-strips-type Integral Boundary Conditions and Impulses,” fractal and fractional, vol. 15, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fernandez, S. Ali, and Akbar Zada, “On non-instantaneous impulsive fractional differential equations and their equivalent integral equations,” Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, pp. 1–10, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Karthikeyan, P. Karthikeyan, H. M. Baskonus, K. Venkatachalam, and Y. Chu, “Almost sectorial operators on Ψ‐Hilfer derivative fractional impulsive integro‐differential equations Ψ- Hilfer derivative fractional impulsive integro-differential equations,” Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 8045–8059, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karthikeyan, A. Debbouche, and D. F. M. Torres, “Analysis of Hilfer fractional integro-differential equations with almost sectorial operators,” Fractal and Fractional, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 22, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karthikeyan, P. Karthikeyan, D. N. Chalishajar, D. S. Raja, and P Sundararajan, “Analysis on ψ-hilfer fractional impulsive differential equations Ψ-hilfer fractional impulsive differential equations,” Symmetry, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1895, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Karthikeyan and K. Venkatachalam, “Some results on multipoint integral boundary value problems for fractional integro-differential equations,” Progress in Fractional Differentiation and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 1–10, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and Z. Hammouch, “On a class of ordinary differential equations in the frame of Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 117, pp. 16–20, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ravichandran, K. Logeswari, and F. Jarad, “New results on existence in the framework of Atangana-Baleanu derivative for fractional integro differential equations,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 125, pp. 194–200, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. J. J. Algahtani, “Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order Allen Cahn model,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 89, no. 23, pp. 552–559, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Abdeljawad, “Fractional operators with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernels and their iterated differintegrals,” Chaos, vol. 29, no. 2, Article ID 023102, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Yavuz, T. A. Sulaiman, A. Yusuf, and T. Abdeljawad, “The Schrodinger-KdV equation of fractional order with Mittag-Leffler nonsingular kernel,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 2715–2724, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang and Y. Zhang, “Ulam-Hyers-Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order delay differential equations,” Optimization, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1181–1190, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Liu, J. Wang, and D. O’Regan, “Ulam–Hyers–Mittag-Leffler stability for ψ-Hilfer fractional-order delay differential equations-Hilfer fractional-order delay differential equations,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2019, no. 1, p. 50, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Abdeljawad and D. Baleanu, “Discrete fractional differences with nonsingular discrete Mittag-Leffler kernels,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 232, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karthikeyan, G. S. Murugapandian, and O. Ege, “On the solutions of fractional integro-differential equations involving Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability results via $\psi$-fractional derivative with boundary value conditionsψ-fractional derivative with boundary value conditions,” Turkish Journal of Mathematics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2500–2512, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Wang, K. Pei, and Y. Chen, “Stability analysis of nonlinear Hadamard fractional differential system,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 12, pp. 6538–6546, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kumam, A. Ali, K. Shah, and R. A. Khan, “Existence results and Hyers-Ulam stability to a class of nonlinear arbitrary order differential equations,” The Journal of Nonlinear Science and Applications, vol. 10, no. 06, pp. 2986–2997, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, M. Chen, X.-B. Shu, and F. Xu, “The existence and hyers-ulam stability of solution for almost periodical fractional stochastic differential equation with fbm,” Stochastic Analysis and Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, L. Shu, X.-B. Shu, and F. Xu, “Existence and Hyers-Ulam Stability of Random Impulsive Stochastic Functional Differential Equations with Finite Delays,” Stochastics, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Zada, B. Pervaiz, and S. O. Shah, “Existence, uniqueness and stability of semilinear nonautonomous impulsive systems on time scales,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, pp. 1–17, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pervaiz, Akbar Zada, Sina Etemad, and S. Rezapour, “An analysis on the controllability and stability to some fractional delay dynamical systems on time scales with impulsive effects,” Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Rozi, S. Kamal, A. K. Zareen, and J. Fahd, “On a class of boundary value problems under ABC fractional derivatives,” Advances in Differce Equations, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Devi and A. Kumar, “Existence and uniqueness results for integro fractional differential equations with atangana-baleanu fractional derivative,” Journal of Mathematical Extension, vol. 15, pp. 1–24, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Jiraporn Reunsumrit et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies