Research Article
Application of Grey Deformation Prediction Model Optimized by Double Coefficient for Tailings Dam
Table 11
Comparison and verification of stage 9 prediction results (extrapolated value).
| Monitoring content | Monitoring point | GM (1, 1) | GM-LT | GM-WC | GDPM-DC | Difference ofrelative error/% | Relative error/% | Relative error/% | Relative error/% | Relative error/% |
| Vertical deformation/mm | SZY-01 | −1.85 | −3.19 | −1.1 | −0.63 | 1.42 | SZY-02 | −1.97 | −3.39 | −1.43 | −0.98 | 1.28 | SZY-03 | −1.67 | −3.11 | −0.84 | −0.29 | 1.58 | SZY-04 | −1.71 | −3.07 | −1.04 | −0.58 | 1.36 | SZY-05 | −1.58 | −2.97 | −1.27 | −1.00 | 0.94 | SZY-06 | −1.49 | −2.94 | −1.18 | −0.65 | 1.22 |
| Transverse deformation/mm | CXY-01 | −3.89 | −8.59 | −2.91 | −0.46 | 4.67 | CXY-02 | −1.51 | −5.72 | −1.03 | −0.73 | 2.02 | CXY-03 | −2.95 | −7.53 | −2.17 | −0.59 | 3.63 | CXY-04 | −1.02 | −5.00 | −0.31 | −0.35 | 1.76 | CXY-05 | −2.99 | −7.90 | −1.83 | −0.35 | 3.89 | CXY-06 | −0.57 | −4.86 | 0.14 | −0.07 | 1.79 |
| Seepage pressure/kPa | SYJ-01 | −11.14 | −10.51 | −10.26 | −3.45 | 7.19 | SYJ-02 | −10.33 | −10.04 | −9.56 | −3.25 | 6.73 | SYJ-03 | −11.13 | −10.50 | −10.25 | −3.25 | 7.38 | SYJ-04 | −10.01 | −9.71 | −9.25 | −2.96 | 6.70 | SYJ-05 | −10.92 | −10.31 | −10.04 | −2.79 | 7.63 | SYJ-06 | −10.81 | −10.54 | −10.04 | −3.71 | 6.75 |
|
|