Research Article

Dynamic Fusion Simulation Method of Intertemporal Decision Preferences of Large Groups in Weak Relationships

Table 2

Interaction adjustment results of period 1 and distribution status of decision information of period 2.

 

Q110.370.450.7387.0780.55
20.270.550.7184.6380.55
30.360.460.7368.3130.22
40.410.410.7459.9970.53
50.823.383.5270.0050.55
60.310.510.7285.6080.55
74.200.004.2071.7470.67

Q280.491.001.2955.8460.53
90.451.041.2855.4960.53
101.492.123.1873.6250.53
110.673.752.1778.2960.55
120.441.051.2826.3620.22
133.600.003.6044.4940.53
140.451.041.2855.4960.53

Q3150.290.340.5666.5680.55
160.635.292.7497.9970.60
170.180.440.5481.9580.53
182.810.002.81100.4770.60
190.250.380.5565.5880.55
203.730.003.7395.6680.67
210.070.400.23121.43100.53

Q4222.810.002.81100.4770.60
230.160.760.4699.8590.55
241.331.482.5289.8670.60
250.702.112.3985.4070.60
261.011.802.4594.2590.67
270.371.601.01120.3980.55
281.331.482.5289.8670.60

Q5290.070.290.3086.2590.53
300.322.121.17109.6230.22
317.000.007.0079.7260.67
322.194.816.0477.6350.60
330.362.041.1824.2820.22
341.355.655.8772.5440.53
351.415.595.8864.2640.55

Arithmetic value
Q10.960.821.6275.346.570.52
Q21.081.432.0155.665.000.49
Q31.140.981.5989.958.000.58
Q41.101.322.0297.157.710.60
Q51.812.933.9273.474.710.47
Total1.221.502.2378.316.400.53

Note. is the result of solving according to (5) and (6) (the same as below).