Research Article
Optimization of Benefit Allocation in Contracted Water-Saving Projects Based on the Shapley Value Method
Table 3
Stakeholders of CWSM projects in colleges.
| Classification | Numbering | Stakeholders | Profitability | Importance | Risk |
| Core stakeholders | S1 | Water-saving service enterprises | High | High | High | S6 | Colleges | High | High | Medium | S4 | Financial institutions | High | Medium | High |
| Dormant stakeholders | S2 | Government water-saving departments | High | Medium | Low | S5 | Water-saving consulting companies | Medium | High | Low | S8 | Water-saving equipment suppliers | Medium | High | Low | S9 | Third-party authentication authority | Medium | High | Low | S10 | Guarantee institutions | Medium | High | Medium | S3 | Construction units | Medium | Medium | Medium | S7 | Supervision units | Medium | Medium | Medium | S13 | Bidding agency | Medium | Medium | Medium | S11 | Education departments | Medium | Low | Low | S14 | College teachers and students | Medium | Low | Low |
| Marginal stakeholders | S12 | Water-saving industry | Low | Low | Low | S15 | Media | Low | Low | Low | S16 | Progeny | Low | Low | Low |
|
|