Research on the Evaluation of Industrial Poverty Alleviation under the Background of the Internet

Table 11

Weight comprehensive ranking table.

A	B criterion layer index	Index weight	C Scheme layer indicators	Index weight	Composite weight	Sort
Index system for evaluating the effectiveness of industrial poverty alleviation work	B1 improvement of living standards	0.1168	C1 source of income	0.1611	0.0188	16
			C2 expenditure structure	0.0806	0.0094	20
			C3 food and clothing guarantee rate	0.3792	0.0443	7
			C4 housing security rate	0.3792	0.0443	7
	B2 policy implementation	0.5732	C5 ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation	0.1883	0.1079	2
			C6 industry helps the poor	0.0598	0.0343	10
			C7 renovation of dilapidated buildings	0.1362	0.0781	5
			C8 ecological poverty alleviation	0.0598	0.0343	10
			C9 education for poverty alleviation	0.0598	0.0343	10
			C10 medical assistance	0.3406	0.1952	1
			C11 workforce skills training	0.1555	0.0891	3
	B3 improvement of poor villages	0.2291	C12 rural drinking water safety rate	0.3425	0.0785	4
			C13 hardening rate of rural roads	0.1365	0.0313	13
			C14 village collective economy	0.1365	0.0313	13
			C15 health and medical facilities	0.0726	0.0166	17
			C16 cultural and sports facilities	0.0417	0.0096	19
			C17 kindergarten and primary school	0.2702	0.0619	6
	B4 accurate poverty alleviation satisfaction	0.0809	C18 satisfaction with helping those responsible	0.0858	0.0069	21
			C19 satisfaction with help methods	0.2887	0.0234	15
			C20 satisfaction with the resident team	0.1296	0.0105	18
			C21 satisfaction with the effectiveness of assistance work	0.4959	0.0401	9