Effect of Farmland Transfer on Poverty Reduction under Different Targeted Poverty Alleviation Patterns Based on PSM-DID Model in Karst Area of China

Table 1

Questionnaire statistics (N = 467).

Item	Variable	N	Proportion (%)
Gender	Male	255	54.6
	Female	212	45.4
Respondents	Nonregistered card Farmer household Holders	381	81.6
	Poor farmer household cardholders	86	18.4
Income level (RMB)	10,000 or less	59	12.6
	10,000–24,000	144	30.9
	25,000–49,000	143	30.6
	50,000–69,000	64	13.7
	70,000 or above	57	12.2
Education level	Elementary or lower	282	60.4
	Middle school	134	28.6
	High school and above	51	11.0
Farmland transfer	Transfer-out	253	81.7
	Transfer-in	57	18.3