Research Article
Exploring the Clinical Benefits of Mixed-Reality Technology for Breast Lumpectomy
Table 3
Doctor-patient communication scores.
| | CT group (n = 22) | MR group (n = 22) | T value | value |
| Communication time (min) | Doctor interpretation of the individual case | 3.724 ± 1.437 | 4.241 ± 0.786 | −1.701 | 0.096 | Patient questions | 2.483 ± 1.122 | 4.379 ± 1.374 | −5.759 | <0.01 | Doctor response | 2.103 ± 0.976 | 4.448 ± 1.429 | −7.296 | <0.01 | Total time | 8.379 ± 2.499 | 12.069 ± 2.103 | −6.084 | <0.01 |
| Knowledge level | Disease | 3.448 ± 0.827 | 4.517 ± 0.575 | −5.714 | <0.01 | Treatment | 3.172 ± 0.693 | 4.724 ± 0.455 | −6.623 | <0.01 | Prognosis | 3.000 ± 0.02 | 4.448 ± 0.572 | −7.917 | <0.01 |
| Satisfaction with communication | Surgical outcomes | 3.207 ± 0.819 | 4.276 ± 0.797 | −5.038 | <0.01 | Treatment confidence | 2.759 ± 0.739 | 3.862 ± 0.789 | −5.494 | <0.01 | Communication methods | 3.138 ± 0.693 | 4.724 ± 0.455 | −10.34 | <0.01 |
| Total score | | 19.448 ± 4.889 | 26.207 ± 1.698 | −7.033 | <0.01 |
|
|
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. CT, conventional treatment; MR, mixed reality.
|