|
| No. | Content of the interviews | Summary of experts’ views |
|
| 1 | What do you think are the main factors to be considered in the division of responsibility for project quality? | The severity of the risk behavior of the participating parties, the causal relationship between the behavior and the results, etc., should be considered |
| 2 | What factors do you think should be considered for the classification of engineering quality risk behavior? | Results of quality risk behavior, the nature of the behavior, etc. |
| 3 | What do you think are the major difficulties in classifying engineering quality risk behavior? | The need to find suitable classification criteria that includes all forms of risk behavior |
| 4 | What do you think should be considered as the basis for the classification of engineering quality risk behavior? | Laws and regulations, regulatory documents, technical appraisal reports, conventions and practices in the industry, etc. |
| 5 | What suggestions would you give for the classification of engineering quality risk behavior? | Give full consideration to the main precepts and classification standards of quality risk behavior |
| 6 | What do you think is the significance of the classification of engineering quality risk behavior to the resolution of multisubject quality disputes? | Classification can provide a quantitative basis for the severity of different types of quality risk behavior |
| 7 | Do judges or arbitrators take the impact of poor-quality behavior on quality liability into account in practical dispute resolution? | Yes, as there is no classification standard and the decision is left to the discretion of the adjudicator on a case-by-case basis |
|
