Research Article

Finite Element and Vibration Frequency Analysis of Cracked Solid Beams: A Comparison of Iron, Steel, and Titanium Materials

Figure 6

Phase of the stress absorbance at different crack position. (a) Position of first crack at 0.01 m and second crack at 0.10 m of iron. (b) Position of first crack at 0.01 m and second crack at 0.10 m of steel. (c) Position of first crack at 0.01 m and second crack at 0.10 m of titanium. (d) Position of first crack at 0.10 m and second crack at 0.20 m of iron. (e) Position of first crack at 0.10 m and second crack at 0.20 m of steel. (f) Position of first crack at 0.10 m and second crack at 0.20 m of titanium. (g) Position of first crack at 0.20 m and second crack at 0.30 m of iron. (h) Position of first crack at 0.20 m and second crack at 0.30 m of steel. (i) Position of first crack at 0.20 m and second crack at 0.30 m of titanium. (j) Uncracked iron beam. (k) Uncracked steel beam. (l) Uncracked titanium beam.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)