Finite Element and Vibration Frequency Analysis of Cracked Solid Beams: A Comparison of Iron, Steel, and Titanium Materials

Figure 9

Cross-section of stress absorption at 0.0085 m and 0.085 m of cracked and uncracked beam. (a) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of cracked iron beam. (b) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of cracked steel beam. (c) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of cracked titanium beam. (d) Cross-section at 0.085 m of cracked iron beam. (e) Cross-section at 0.085 m of cracked steel beam. (f) Cross-section at 0.085 m of cracked titanium beam. (g) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of uncracked iron beam. (h) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of uncracked steel beam. (i) Cross-section at 0.0085 m of uncracked titanium beam.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)