Comparative Retrospective Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery, Native Tissue Repair, and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Table 1

Surgical procedures and postoperative outcomes.

Surgery		TVM surgery	NTR	LSC
N		243	31	34
Age (years)		69.61 ± 8.31 (46–88)	65.68 ± 11.34 (35–85)	65.32 ± 3.23 (44–70)
POP-Q stage	II	45 (18.5%)	14 (45.2%)	9 (24.5%)
	III	168 (69.1%)	11 (35.5%)	24 (70.6%)
	IV	30 (12.3%)	6 (19.4%)	1 (0.03%)
Recurrence (%)		15 (6.17％)	1 (3.23)	4 (11.76％)	NS
Mesh erosion (%)		13 (5.35％)	N/A	0	NS
Reoperation (%)		5 (2.14％)	0 (0％)	1 (2.94％)	NS
		(Erosion, n = 3. Recurrence, n = 2)		(Recurrence)

^aANOVA. ^bChi-squared test. NS: not statistically significant; TVM: tension-free vaginal mesh; NTR: native tissue repair; LSC: laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.