Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2020 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Comparative Retrospective Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery, Native Tissue Repair, and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Table 1 Surgical procedures and postoperative outcomes.
Surgery TVM surgery NTR LSC N 243 31 34 Age (years) 69.61 ± 8.31 (46–88) 65.68 ± 11.34 (35–85) 65.32 ± 3.23 (44–70) POP-Q stage II 45 (18.5%) 14 (45.2%) 9 (24.5%) III 168 (69.1%) 11 (35.5%) 24 (70.6%) IV 30 (12.3%) 6 (19.4%) 1 (0.03%) Recurrence (%) 15 (6.17%) 1 (3.23) 4 (11.76%) NS Mesh erosion (%) 13 (5.35%) N/A 0 NS Reoperation (%) 5 (2.14%) 0 (0%) 1 (2.94%) NS (Erosion, n = 3. Recurrence, n = 2) (Recurrence)
a ANOVA. b Chi-squared test. NS: not statistically significant; TVM: tension-free vaginal mesh; NTR: native tissue repair; LSC: laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.