Determinants of Pelvic Floor Disorders among Women Visiting the Gynecology Outpatient Department in Wolkite University Specialized Center, Wolkite, Ethiopia

Table 3

Prevalence and cooccurrence of pelvic floor disorder among study participants.

Variable	Frequency	% (95% CI
Any pelvic floor disorder (n = 270)	48	17.8 (13.3–22.2)
Only one disorder (n = 48)	35	72.9 (60.4–85.4)
Two disorders (n = 48)	9	18.8 (8.3–29.2)
All three disorders (n = 48)	4	8.3 (2.1–16.7)
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) (n = 270)	24	8.9 (5.6–12.6)
POP only (n = 24)	13	54.2 (33.3–74.9)
POP with UI (n = 24)	1	4.2 (0.0–12.5)
POP with AI (n = 24)	6	25.0 (8.3–41.7)
POP with any other PFD (n = 24)	4	16.7 (4.2–33.3)
Urinary incontinence (UI) (n = 270)	25	9.3 (5.6–13.0)
UI only (n = 25)	18	72.0 (52.0–88.0)
UI with POP (n = 25)	1	4.0 (0.0–12.0)
UI with AI (n = 25)	2	8.0 (0.0–20.0)
UI with any other PFD (n = 25)	4	16.0 (4.0–32.0)
Anal incontinence (AI) (n = 270)	16	5.9 (3.3–8.9)
AI Only (n = 16)	4	25.0 (6.3–50.0)
AI with POP (n = 16)	6	37.5 (12.5–62.5)
AI with UI (n = 16)	2	12.5 (0.0–31.3)
AI with any other PFD (n = 16)	4	25.0 (6.3–43.8)