Research Article

Effect of the Antioxidant Lipoic Acid in Aortic Phenotype in a Marfan Syndrome Mouse Model

Table 6

Aortic dilation and wall thickness by optical coherence tomography analyses in WT and MFS mice with 6 months of age after losartan or lipoic acid treatments.

UntreatedLosartan treatmentLipoic acid treatment
WT6MFS6WT6MFS6WT6MFS6
()()()()()()

Aortic arch
Lumen (mm2)7.7 ± 0.212.2 ± 1.58.2 ± 0.96.3 ± 0.49.3 ± 0.616.0 ± 1.3a–d
Thickness (mm)5.2 ± 0.27.4 ± 0.15.1 ± 0.44.6 ± 0.45.7 ± 1.210.4 ± 1.2e–g
Thoracic aorta
Lumen (mm2)7.1 ± 0.210.2 ± 0.37.5 ± 0.95.6 ± 0.58.1 ± 1.312.8 ± 1.2e,g
Thickness (mm)4.0 ± 0.16.2 ± 0.6e3.8 ± 0.2h4.0 ± 0.2h5.4 ± 0.48.4 ± 0.3h–l
Abdominal aorta
Lumen (mm2)6.5 ± 0.210.9 ± 0.8a6.5 ± 0.9m4.3 ± 0.1n7.3 ± 0.3g,h10.6 ± 0.1b,i,k,l
Thickness (mm)6.1 ± 0.48.3 ± 0.1a6.5 ± 0.1h6.3 ± 0.1m6.6 ± 0.4m9.8 ± 0.1i–k,o

WT: wild type; MFS: Marfan syndrome; 6: 6 months of age; a versus untreated WT6; b versus losartan treatment WT6; c versus losartan treatment MFS6; d versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; e versus untreated WT6; f versus losartan treatment WT6; g versus losartan treatment MFS6; h versus untreated MFS6; i versus untreated WT6; j versus losartan treatment WT6; k versus losartan treatment MFS6; l versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; m versus untreated MFS6; n versus untreated MFS6; o versus lipoic acid treatment WT6.