Review Article

Pharmacotherapies for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Pairwise comparisons of treatments.

Amitriptyline-0.07 (-0.79; 0.64)........-0.24 (-0.72; 0.24)..

-0.08 (-0.75; 0.58)Carbamazepine........-0.15 (-0.87; 0.57)..
0.68 (-0.33; 1.68)0.76 (-0.35; 1.86)Etanercept.......-0.92 (-1.80; -0.03)..
0.08 (-0.79; 0.95)0.17 (-0.82; 1.15)-0.59 (-1.74; 0.55)Ketamin......-0.32 (-1.05; 0.41)..
1.15 (0.21; 2.10)1.24 (0.18; 2.29)0.48 (-0.72; 1.68)1.07 (-0.02; 2.16)Lamotrigine.....-1.39 (-2.21; -0.58)..
1.88 (0.89; 2.86)1.96 (0.87; 3.04)1.20 (-0.03; 2.43)1.79 (0.67; 2.92)0.72 (-0.46; 1.90)Levetiracetam....-2.11 (-2.97; -1.26)..
0.41 (-0.45; 1.27)0.49 (-0.48; 1.46)-0.27 (-1.40; 0.86)0.33 (-0.69; 1.34)-0.75 (-1.83; 0.34)-1.47 (-2.58; -0.35)Lidocaine...-0.65 (-1.36; 0.06)..
0.41 (-0.47; 1.28)0.49 (-0.50; 1.48)-0.27 (-1.42; 0.88)0.32 (-0.71; 1.36)-0.75 (-1.84; 0.35)-1.47 (-2.60; -0.34)-0.00 (-1.02; 1.02)Morphine..-0.65 (-1.38; 0.09)..
-0.22 (-1.00; 0.57)-0.13 (-1.04; 0.77)-0.89 (-1.97; 0.19)-0.30 (-1.26; 0.66)-1.37 (-2.39; -0.35)-2.09 (-3.15; -1.03)-0.62 (-1.57; 0.32)-0.62 (-1.58; 0.34)Naloxone.-0.02 (-0.64; 0.60)..
2.19 (0.98; 3.40)2.27 (0.97; 3.57)1.51 (0.09; 2.93)2.11 (0.78; 3.43)1.03 (-0.34; 2.41)0.31 (-1.09; 1.72)1.78 (0.46; 3.10)1.78 (0.45; 3.12)2.40 (1.13; 3.68)Pamidronate.-0.05 (-0.91; 0.81).
-0.24 (-0.72; 0.24)-0.16 (-0.82; 0.51)-0.92 (-1.80; -0.03)-0.32 (-1.05; 0.41)-1.39 (-2.21; -0.58)-2.11 (-2.97; -1.26)-0.65 (-1.36; 0.06)-0.65 (-1.38; 0.09)-0.02 (-0.64; 0.60)-2.43 (-3.54; -1.31)Placebo2.38 (1.67; 3.09)0.46 (0.22; 0.71)
2.14 (1.28; 3.00)2.22 (1.25; 3.19)1.46 (0.33; 2.60)2.06 (1.04; 3.07)0.99 (-0.10; 2.07)0.26 (-0.85; 1.38)1.73 (0.73; 2.74)1.73 (0.71; 2.75)2.36 (1.41; 3.30)-0.05 (-0.91; 0.81)2.38 (1.67; 3.09)Prednisone.
0.23 (-0.31; 0.76)0.31 (-0.40; 1.02)-0.45 (-1.37; 0.46)0.14 (-0.63; 0.91)-0.93 (-1.78; -0.08)-1.65 (-2.54; -0.76)-0.18 (-0.94; 0.57)-0.18 (-0.96; 0.59)0.44 (-0.23; 1.11)-1.96 (-3.10; -0.82)0.46 (0.22; 0.71)-1.91 (-2.67; -1.16)Pregabalin

Footnotes: The comparisons between any two treatments should be read from left to right, and the comparison estimate (expressed as standard mean difference [SMD] and its related 95%CI) is in the cell between the column-defining treatment and the row-defining treatment. The top half of the table presents SMDs from direct comparison evidence, while the bottom half of the table presents SMDs from network meta-analysis. In top half, SMDs >0 favor row-defining treatments vs. column-defining treatments. In the bottom half, SMDs <0 favor column-defining treatments. Empty cells indicate no direct comparison between two treatments.